Poll shows voters would deny public assistance to illegals


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:58 PM MDT


Howard Fischer/Capitol Media Services


PHOENIX -- By a margin of more than 4-1, Arizonans support a ballot measure designed to cut services to those not here legally, according to a new statewide survey.

But the director of the campaign to kill Proposition 200 said that result is due solely to the way the question is worded. And both sides expect those numbers to narrow between now and the Nov. 2 election.

The poll done for KAET-TV, the Phoenix PBS affiliate, shows that 74 percent of those asked said they would vote for a measure to "deny state and local social and welfare services to illegal immigrants and require everyone who registers to vote to prove they are U.S. citizens and to provide identification when voting.'' Only 16 percent were opposed, with just 10 percent saying they had no opinion at this point.

Kathy McKee, organizer of the Protect Arizona Now campaign, said the results of the survey of 387 registered voters conducted between last Thursday and Sunday reflect the true feelings of Arizonans. But McKee noted the campaign has yet to start.

"We know some people with deep pockets are going to buy negative advertising,'' she said. "It will be interesting to see whether people believe the negative advertising instead of what they see with their own two eyes.''

Alfredo Gutierrez, who is heading the Statue of Liberty Coalition, acknowledged that there will be advertising. And much of that, he said, will be to inform would-be voters that they perceptions about what Proposition 200 would do are wrong.

He said even the name of McKee's group, Protect Arizona Now, is misleading. He said it "implies Osama bin Laden or killer bees'' and has "nothing to do with security, with safety, with the border.''

Working in his favor is the fact that the official ballot description approved by the Secretary of State's Office does not use "Protect Arizona Now.'' Similarly, Gutierrez said there is no mention of "illegal immigrants'' in the ballot language -- as there is in the poll question -- with the ballot language dealing instead with proof of citizenship.

Pollster Bruce Merrill said the questions are based on the "common vernacular'' of how words are used. He also questioned whether it would have made any difference, noting that a query last year which never mentioned "illegal immigrants'' or the organization name turned up pretty much the same results.

Merrill agreed with Gutierrez' contention that the results could change significantly if there is a high-profile advertising campaign against the measure.

The survey has a margin of error of 5 percent.

Secretary of State's Office Proposition 200:

Requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote, requires rejection of voter registration not accompanied by proof of citizenship, requires identification before receiving a ballot, requires state and local governments verify identity of certain public benefits applicants and requires government employees t report immigration law violations by public benefit applicants.

-- Source: Secretary of State's Office

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750