Attorney: Drug mule grandma's prosecution discriminatory

By Jonathan Clark/Wick News Service
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, January 13, 2007 11:20 AM MST


BISBEE - The attorney for a Douglas grandmother who was found guilty of running drugs wants a judge to overturn the conviction on the grounds that prosecutors discriminated against her for being a U.S. citizen and a resident of Cochise County.


Leticia Villareal Garcia was arrested in early 2005 after Arizona Department of Public Safety officers, acting on a tip from an informant, found 214 pounds of marijuana in a car she was driving to Tucson for a bingo outing. A Superior Court jury convicted the 61-year-old grandmother in November of transporting marijuana for sale, a Class 2 felony punishable by up to 12 1/2 years in prison.

But defense attorney Robert Zohlmann says that because the informant's tip came to DPS by way of U.S. Customs and Immigration, Garcia's conviction was a result of a federal referral. And he believes the county attorney's policy for prosecuting federal drug referrals is discriminatory.

In a motion filed Thursday in Superior Court, Zohlmann cited a Dec. 23 story in the Herald/Review suggesting that federal authorities decline to prosecute marijuana cases in which the amount of pot is under 500 pounds.

Deputy County Attorney David Pardee was quoted in the story as saying that federal authorities often refer under-500-pound cases to his office, and that they generally involve Mexican nationals or other non-locals ferrying drugs through the county to cities such as Tucson and Phoenix.

The county attorney declines these cases, Pardee said, unless they involve local police agencies or residents.

Zohlmann believes this practice constitutes selective prosecution and is therefore unconstitutional.

"Implicit in the news article is the conclusion that if Ms. Garcia had been a Mexican national or not a local resident, the Cochise County attorney's policy would have resulted in her not being prosecuted at all," Zohlmann wrote.

Deputy County Attorney Doyle Johnstun, the prosecutor in the case, received a copy Zohlmann's motion Thursday but had not fully read it or filed a response.

However, he suggested Zohlmann had incorrectly identified Garcia's case as a federal referral. The informant, he said, had been working for the DPS as well as for ICE.

In a Jan. 2 e-mail attached as an appendix to Zohlmann's motion, Johnstun told Zohlmann that his office has no written policy regarding federal drug referrals.

But he said factors such as a lack of resources and an inability to subpoena federal officers made the referrals difficult to take on.

Therefore, the county attorney limits its federal referral prosecutions to those cases that most affect Cochise County, Johnstun said.

Sentencing for Garcia's drug-running conviction was initially scheduled for Thursday but was continued until Jan. 26. Judge Wallace Hoggatt will hear oral argument on Zohlmann's motion at that time.

Hoggatt is currently considering another motion from Zohlmann that argues the trial jury wrongly convicted Garcia because Johnstun never proved she knowingly transported the marijuana.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750