Off-road vehicles may have to pay fee

By Howard Fischer/ Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:38 PM MDT


PHOENIX - State senators voted Tuesday to require owners of off-road vehicles to pay a new fee for the privilege of operatin them anywhere on public lands or roads.


HB 2443 would require off-road vehicles, all-terrain vehicles an off-road recreational vehicles to have a license issued by th state Department of Transportation. That would include "dir bikes.''

The fee would be set by the agency but is expected to cost n more than $25 a year, a figure legislative staffers estimat would bring in $6.8 million a year once fully implemented in 2009.

HB 2443 also would require those younger than 18 to have headgear that is both properly fitted and fastened.

All vehicles would need to have mufflers, spark arrestors and, when operated on sand dunes, flags. And those operated fro twilight to sun-up also would need headlights and tail lights.

The legislation also would make it a crime, punishable by 30 days in jail and a $500 fine, to drive off a marked trial in a wa that damages wildlife habitat or natural resources.

But the big debate Tuesday was over the fees.

State law already requires any vehicle operated on a public road to have a state-issued license. But Rep. Jerry Weiers, R-Glendale, said some people buy the vehicles and don't get them licensed - or pay other state taxes - arguing they are no driving on public roads.

That results in less money in the state treasury, funds share with the state Parks and state Game and Fish departments.

Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City, said the legislation woul shift the burden of trail maintenance and other activities to young people, the ones with the smaller off-road vehicles which now are not licensed. And he warned Republican colleagues that is the wrong message to be sending to the state's newest voters.

"If you want to build a party, I would suggest that we don't offend people that might be willing to join our party,'' Gould said. He said the legislation goes against GOP goals of les government and taxes "even though it has a Republican sponsor.'

But Sen. Meg Burton Cahill, D-Tempe, said not everyone believes there is no responsibility to help pay for the programs administered by state agencies which maintain trails as well as police the rural areas to ensure that riders don't destroy habitat.

"We taught our son that there are costs to things in life,'' said

Burton Cahill, who purchased an all-terrain vehicle for her son.

She said he believes that the parks where he rides should be

maintained.

Sen. Robert Blendu, R-Litchfield Park, was not convinced of the

need to raise more money. He said many of these vehicles are

operated on property operated by the U.S. Forest Service, which

has its own fees for users.

"This is just a tax that doesn't need to be,'' he said.

But Sen. Tom O'Halleran, R-Sedona, said various groups that are

involved with off-road activities are in support of the bill.

The measure exempts vehicles ridden only on private property. And

lawmakers also altered the measure to spell out that the special

plates are not required for off-road vehicles operated on Indian

lands.

A final Senate vote is needed before the measure returns to the

House, which adopted a somewhat different version of the bill.

-30-

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750