More charges filed against Watkins

By Larry Blaskey
The Daily Dispatch
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, December 6, 2007 3:05 PM MST


A second set of charges was filed against former Huber Middle School Administrator George Watkins during a special meeting of the Douglas Unified School District Governing Board last night, Wednesday, December 5.


Watkins had earlier been charged with misappropriation of funds and lying during a hearing on October 18.

Prior to issuing of new charges the board reviewed a settlement agreement offered by Watkins. Following a 40 -minute executive session, the board rejected the settlement unanimously.

During the meeting, the board also ratified its previous action.

Reportedly, the administration told Watkins during a meeting that he could have a hearing in open or closed session, but failed to provide the same information in the notice sent to his home.

Because of the error, the 30-day appeal process begins again.

New charges

Three separate charges were filed on Wednesday following a 30-minute executive session, relating to misappropriation of student funds involving sales of items.

With the approval of the charges, Watkins has 30 days to file his intent to appeal the termination.

In the first incident, during the 2006-07 school year, students were charged $5 for IDs and $7 for replacement IDs.

A total of 415 IDs were sold and 15 replacement IDs amounting to a total of $2,180. According to Lucinda Manjarres, funds were turned into Watkins daily.

No ID deposits were made to either student activities or student auxiliary accounts during the 2006-07 or 2007-08 school years.

The only cash deposit during this time period was $30 to the Yearbook account.

In the second charge, the district alleges that Watkins failed to deposit funds for lanyards sold during 2007-08.

Approximately 259 lanyards were sold at $2 each and six for $3 each for a total of $524.

The last charge involves the sale of physical education uniforms.

No purchase order for uniforms have been made since 2005-06, and the Physical Education department has only been selling any leftover shirts or shorts for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years.

It was reported that only a few items sold this year, but no deposit of these funds were made.

Previous charges

On October 1, funds were turned into Watkins to place in the safe totaling $1,143.50. An additional check was brought to him of $15.25. When asked to look at the money to count it and finalize the numbers before they went to the bank, Watkins could only provide the check and a portion of the funds. He said he forgot the safe key at his home. When the money was returned on October 3, they were not in the same envelopes or in the same denominations in which they had been delivered.

In a meeting with central administration, Watkins said he had used the money to make change. Regardless, use of the funds was in violation of school district policy.

On October 4, Watkins said he used approximately $250 collected by students to give to a student's mother to help her with food cost for her child's restrictive diet. When the mother was called, it turned out funds had not been given to her.

In a later interview Watkins admitted lying about giving the money to the child's mother to cover misuse of funds.

Between Oct 2 and 3, according to the charges, Watkins attempted to fraudulently use Tax Credit money to purchase 13 tickets at $15.25 for the Chamber Theatre Productions to cover the cost of the missing money originally brought to him. Watkins then told them he was using that Tax Credit money to purchase the tickets. Later, the business office was contacted by Sally Portugal about use of the Tax Credit money in this way.

When questioned by central administration, Watkins said he was using the Tax Credit money to purchase tickets for needy students at an instructor’s request. It was later learned no such request had been made.

In a separate incident, Watkins had been given the proceeds of the Welcome Back Dance of $653. Records indicated Watkins failed to deposit the funds within a week of the event. When asked about the deposit, Watkins stated the funds were used to buy lanyards. This had been done without student council approval.

According to a purchase order, it clearly stated that district funds were used to buy the lanyards.

Seven $100 bills were found in the safe opposed to the $653 in small bills that were given to Watkins.

The final incident occurred on September 12 and 20 when the National Honor Society sponsored a juice pop sale. They provided Watkins a total of $188.

Again, that money was never deposited.

According to statements from those interviewed, there have been several fundraisers with money generated and given to Watkins.

The board ended the December 5 meeting by unanimously making themselves the hearing officers for the termination appeal.

An earlier motion by Board member Art Estrada to select a separate hearing officer died for the lack of a second.

Comments

    Parent wrote on Jan 4, 2008 4:33 PM:

    " DUE PROCESS has nothing to do with being arrested for a crime you may have committed. There can be no DUE PROCESS without an arrest. "

    Parent 2 wrote on Dec 21, 2007 12:59 PM:

    " Mr. Watkins is going through what is called DUE PROCESS. He has this given right, let's see what comes out of it. I tell you, it starts at the top, just look into Zamar's expense reports going back years, hint, hint. "

    Parent wrote on Dec 18, 2007 8:27 PM:

    " DUSD holds all of our children accountable to zero tolerance standards. Why are the DUSD staff members not all held to the same zero tolerance standards by DUSD administration? If just one of our children are not able to return to school for their actions then Mr. Watkins shouldn't be able to return to any DUSD property, event or project based on his actions. Rules apply to everyone not just some. "

    Parent wrote on Dec 18, 2007 8:05 PM:

    " Mr. Watkins should be held accountable with the same degree he held his students. The police should have been called on the spot. Administration should have recommended he be arrested on the spot. All charges should have been filed immediately. He should have been dismissed from the district immediately. In no way should he be allowed at DHS or any DUSD property or events, unless he is attending his hearings. If he can't take it he shouldn't dish it out. He should feel the same Wrath he gives out without any mercy. "

    Voice of Reason wrote on Dec 13, 2007 1:36 AM:

    " First of all, to all you screaming for Mr. Watkins' blood, the American way is "Innocent Until Proven Guilty", not visa versa. Second, if Mr. Watkins is found to have stolen student money, why does it have to end in termination? Why would it not suffice to order Mr. Watkins to repay the money, with interest if necessary, give him a letter of reprimand, and let it be at that. After all, no students were harmed in any way nor were any in any danger af being harmed. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. "

    annonomous wrote on Dec 12, 2007 8:57 AM:

    " they charge studaents for id's but does any 1 really know where the money goes? they should use the money for new books there books are ancient about to fall apart .why did the distric still place him at dhs what makaes them think hes not going to do it there .why arent they also making a big deal out of the teachers that were involved with students and drugs .are the students not important . the district should take those teachers out but i guess they dont care about the students and there safety "

    R wrote on Dec 11, 2007 4:47 PM:

    " You're right Mark! It is very sad. Not the comments, but the fact that Mr. Watkins didn't think of the consequences of what he would put his family and especially his kids through. That's what is SAD! "

    R wrote on Dec 11, 2007 9:31 AM:

    " Douglas will never change! What happened to all the teachers and their stupid comments about him making change? Misappropration of funds? He stole that money, and when he realized that he actually had smart people working for him and they figured out what he was doing, he put the money back. Teachers and DUSD staff have NEVER, cared about students (maybe a few), that's the reason the schools in Douglas are not at the standards they should be. "

    TAG wrote on Dec 10, 2007 4:23 PM:

    " The board should not even consider a settlement until all charges have been addressed whether by review board or trial. As far as I'm concerned, Mr. Watkins took an early "settlement" when he decided to steal money from the students and faculty. "

    mark wrote on Dec 10, 2007 2:42 PM:

    " I can't believe some of these comments. How sad, how ignorant. "

    john wrote on Dec 10, 2007 9:33 AM:

    " i went to school there last year and he would try to sell me underware. "

    culo101 wrote on Dec 10, 2007 9:29 AM:

    " This guy was stealing the students money that they paid for i.d.'s with. I think this guy should be behind bars next to bubba "

    DHS student. wrote on Dec 10, 2007 8:30 AM:

    " Chuck has a point! How often do these supposed "Douglas Products" get off the hook with a simple slap on the wrist?! ALL THE TIME! That's Douglas for you. Yes, due to the fact that Mr. Watkins is Anglo does have an impact on the issue. It's sad to know, but it's true. This small community consisting of mostly hispanics still acts as though it has superiors. Mr. Watkins has done wrong and everyone knows it. He's committed a crime ethical as well and immoral and should be tried as fair as anyone else. "

    that is wrong wrote on Dec 9, 2007 8:35 PM:

    " My opinion about this article on Mr. Watkins is it really hurts Douglas students. Finding out about this man stealing money kind of gives me the idea teachers and staff of DUSD really dont care about their students education. If this man did it who know how long he has been doing it others might be doing it to. But just have not gotten caught yet. Also, if Watkins did wrong the people covering for him should also get it. "

    in reply to CHUCK... wrote on Dec 9, 2007 2:56 PM:

    " Chuck...what an ignorant statement to make. Do you realize that Douglas is like 90% Hispanic? Dont play the race card. Not neccessary. Maybe he wasn't fired on the spot or charged for criminal offenses becuase he's a "Douglas Product" and carries the same traits as many other Douglas government officials, school board members, and administration. The uneducated people in these positions can not handle the pressures of integrity and responsiblity. White, Black, Hispanic, Blue, Purple, dont matter. Too much of this town is corrupt, about 80% probably. "

    U K wrote on Dec 9, 2007 11:02 AM:

    " I believe if you go back to the start, , you will see Mr Watkins, learned from the best it seems people in Douglas are getting away with this things since a long time ago. "

    Small town wrote on Dec 9, 2007 1:18 AM:

    " To the student who says there are acomplices at DHS.. where and who? If you are going to make comments, then explain. Have criminal charges been charged? If not, why? To Chuck... what does any of this have to do with being anglo? I think it has more to do with the upper admin. not wanting too much press for lack of management. Sure guilty but what about those who are suppose to do checks and balances? New Supt. has a lot of work ahead of them. That starts with trying to control the so-called Chuck Hoyack show. "

    Umm Me wrote on Dec 8, 2007 2:13 PM:

    " Proving once again our whole town is corrupt "

    jcr wrote on Dec 7, 2007 11:19 AM:

    " Mr. Watkins should have been fired at the spot. His position and his status should not interfere with decisions. The formalities that are suppose to to take place are a bunch of bull, because that rule does not apply to everyone employed by DUSD. Its who you are and who you know in the district that counts. "

    DHS Student wrote on Dec 7, 2007 11:07 AM:

    " He might have acomplices at DHS also. "

    outraged wrote on Dec 7, 2007 8:10 AM:

    " So has he been indicted on criminal charges yet? What happened to the comments now Teachers who were covering up for him?? I guess he wasn't making change after all.. This is just the beginning how many other teachers in the same middle school are committing other immoral acts.. you know who you are... He should save all the embarassment to himself and family and be a man and admit he did was wrong instead of lying like the rest of the teachers... Time to resign.. "

    K. Johnson wrote on Dec 7, 2007 4:44 AM:

    " I have not followed this story and just happened to read this article. The activity described here in my opinion extends well beyond misappropriation of funds - it's criminal - purely theft of funds. Additionally - there may be a management issue; who is providing over-sight activity to insure these sorts of activities are not occuring? Plus, this article suggests that he was afforded many opportunities to commit - he probably should have been detected much earlier. This entire ordeal qualifies the justification for an audit - very sad. "

    Chuck wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:20 PM:

    " I have some questions. Why haven't they put this guy in jail? Is it because he is Anglo? How can the board unanimously name themselves hearing officers? Is this not 'conflict of interest?' I truly believe Mr. Estrada had the 'right idea' on selecting a separate hearing officer. Someone seems to be on a 'power trip.' "

    I told you so wrote on Dec 6, 2007 5:03 PM:

    " What did I tell you people in Douglas and all you teachers trying to cover up for him a thief is a thief!!!! "

    mark wrote on Dec 6, 2007 4:59 PM:

    " Why doesn't the paper also report on Mr. Watkins' responses to the allegations made? This seems pretty one-sided to me. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street
Douglas, AZ 85607
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750
Subscribe Online
Place A Classified