Attorneys want FBI to release records in deadly border shooting case

By Jonathon Shacat
WICK NEWS SERVICE
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, January 12, 2008 3:05 PM MST


BISBEE — Attorneys prosecuting the case of a U.S. Border Patrol agent charged with murdering an illegal immigrant have filed a motion in federal court in Tucson asking a judge to order the FBI to release documents relating to the case.


Nicholas Corbett is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide of Francisco Javier Dominguez Rivera.

On Nov. 30, the defense filed a motion requesting disclosure of materials that are favorable to the defendant or affect the credibility of the state’s case.

During a hearing Dec. 17, the prosecution notified the court that it was having difficulty obtaining discovery from federal agencies.

Judge David Bury told the attorneys that if the government does not comply, he would sign an order requiring it.

Special prosecutors Grant Woods and Tyrone Mitchell filed a motion Thursday requesting assistance from the court to get the documents.

“On December 4, 2007, the state of Arizona sent a subpoena to the FBI requesting all evidence relating to its investigation of this case. On or about December 27, 2007, an agent from the FBI contacted counsel and informed me that they would be producing documents within the next two weeks,” the motion says.

“On January 10, 2008, a representative of the FBI informed plaintiff that they would not be producing any materials for us to review on the advice of counsel,” it continues.

Sean Chapman, the lead defense attorney, filed a response Friday stating he does not object to the motion because it is an appropriate effort to obtain “discoverable” and “possibly exculpatory evidence.”

“The defense further request that any documents disclosed by the FBI be provided to the defense. Additionally, if the state believes that an issue exists with respect to whether any of the documents provided to the state by the FBI should be disclosed to the defense, the defendant requests that those documents be submitted to the court for in camera review,” the motion says.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750