Attorneys for agent charged with murder seek dismissal of case

By Jonathon Shacat
WICK NEWS SERVICE
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, January 19, 2008 10:52 AM MST


BISBEE — Attorneys representing a U.S. Border Patrol agent charged with murdering an illegal immigrant near Naco filed a motion Friday in U.S. District Court in Tucson requesting the judge dismiss the case.


Nicholas Corbett killed Francisco Dominguez-Rivera of Mexico on Jan. 12, 2007. He is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide.

Sean Chapman and Jim Calle, the attorneys defending Corbett, argue that their client was protected by the Supremacy Clause because he was working as a federal law enforcement officer.

“The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides immunity from state prosecution for federal agents who were acting under federal authority and whose actions were necessary and proper to carry out their law enforcement authority,” the motion says.

According to the motion, Dominguez-Rivera, his brothers, Jorge and Rene, and his sister-in-law, Sandra Vidal Guzman, illegally entered the United States with a group of other Mexican nationals on Jan. 12, 2007. At one point, the group spotted a Border Patrol vehicle and began to scatter.

The Dominguez brothers and Guzman talked with their coyote and decided to cross back into Mexico. The coyote ran back toward the border and many members of the group followed him. Guzman was unable to keep up and she told the brothers to stop running.

When they were within a few hundred yards of the border, they saw another Border Patrol vehicle. Some members of the group arrived back in Mexico, but some others were picked up by the Border Patrol. Corbett, who was driving a Border Patrol vehicle, pursued the brothers and Guzman. They continued to try to evade capture until Corbett eventually stopped them.

“As agent Corbett stopped his vehicle, he saw Francisco pick up a rock. Corbett already had three aliens in his vehicle that he had arrested moments earlier. Agent Corbett exited his vehicle and drew his weapon. Agent Corbett began issuing commands in Spanish for Francisco and his group to stop and get down. Three of the aliens complied. Francisco did not,” the motion says.

“As agent Corbett came around his vehicle, he was confronted face-to-face by Francisco who attempted to hit agent Corbett with the rock. Fearing serious bodily injury or death, agent Corbett fired one round from his service-issued handgun and killed Francisco,” it continues.

The Cochise County Attorney’s Office charged Corbett on April 23 based on evidence that includes FBI investigations and forensic reports that contradict his account of the events as told to his supervisors at the Border Patrol’s Naco Station.

Comments

    T wrote on Jan 24, 2008 12:52 AM:

    " I agree with Janet I am convinced this is why the Border Patrol Agent that was recently hit and killed lost his life was because he hesitated long enough to wonder just how much trouble will I be in if I draw and fire my weapon at this vehicle and its driver. Our Border Patrol need to be able to perform their job with the backing and support of our Government. Ramos and Compean are further testimony to our Governments unwillingness to let our Border Patrol, patrol our border without fear of consequence for performing their job. "

    JanetP wrote on Jan 19, 2008 11:55 AM:

    " How on earth can we continue to get people to serve as law enforcement officers when after risking their lives they are prosecuted for murder?

    I would hate to see the headline on this story read: "Officer slain after being injured by rock." The criminals who put themselves in this position have to accept responsibility for their actions. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750