Napolitano says federal government needs to offset border fence delay


Published/Last Modified on Friday, March 14, 2008 3:06 PM MDT


 PHOENIX (AP) — The drawdown of National Guard troops along the U.S.-Mexico border should be stopped or alternative border security improvements provided because of problems with a high-tech “virtual fence” project, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano said Wednesday.


Problems with the “Project 28” project, a 28-mile array of radars and surveillance cameras near Sasabe, indicate that broad implementation of a “virtual fence” along the nation’s southern border won’t happen soon, Napolitano said in a letter to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

“Common sense dictates that the drawdown should stop, and that a continued National Guard presence should be maintained,” Napolitano wrote in the letter released Wednesday by her office. “If, indeed, the drawdown continues, it is prudent to ask: what other steps will the department take to shore up border security in lieu of the ‘virtual fence?’”

A Chertoff spokesman did not immediately return calls for comment late Wednesday.

Project 28 is part of a national plan to secure the U.S.-Mexico border with physical barriers and high-tech detection capabilities.

Chertoff announced final approval of the fence last month. The government plans to extend the fence to other areas of the Arizona border, as well as to sections of Texas as early as this summer.

Last year, the government withheld some of Boeing’s payments for the system because technology the company used in the test project did not work properly. Boeing also was late in delivering the final product. Because of this, the department received a $2 million credit from the company to go toward maintenance and logistical support of the system, according to Homeland Security officials.

The government paid Boeing $15 million of its initial $20 million contract before determining that there were glitches in the test project. The department gave a conditional acceptance in December.

Homeland Security spokeswoman Laura Keehner said last week that the virtual fence works and has helped capture 2,200 illegal immigrants since December.

She said the agency has been forthcoming about the technological deficiencies identified last year, and that’s why acceptance of the project was delayed until last month.

Comments

    Frank Lee wrote on Mar 22, 2008 11:42 PM:

    " Are they building the required double fence or only a single fence? Here in San Diego we showed that only a double fence is effective. The law calls for a double fence. No news report tells whether it is a double or single fence. I sure wish someone would find out and report what they are building. "

    Texan123 wrote on Mar 20, 2008 1:02 PM:

    " The truth is that the federal government has no intention to secure the border against illegal immigration. Harvest season is coming and the 30 million illegal immigrants already here are not enough to satisfy law breaking employers. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750