State’s guest worker program hits snag

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 3:07 PM MDT


PHOENIX — Efforts to enact the first-ever state-run guest worker program hit a snag Monday over the question of which industries should be able to benefit.


Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, said he is willing to bac legislation by two Southeast Arizona legislators to allow foreign nationals to come into the state to fill certain jobs. Pearce also said that Sen. Marsha Arzberger, D-Willcox and Rep. Bill

Konopnicki, R-Safford, have included some safeguards to prevent these temporary workers from becoming permanent U.S. residents or getting taxpayer-subsidized services.

But Pearce said unless two provisions are changed he will lead the charge to kill the plan.

Pearce’s opposition could prove fatal: He not only is the author of the state’s new employer sanctions law but has been able to marshall votes in the Republican-controlled Legislature to gain approval for various other immigration and border security measures.

Arzberger and Konopnicki filed a new version of their measure Monday in hopes of finding a politically acceptable state solution to what they say is a shortage of workers in certain industries. Efforts to expand existing federal work visas programs have gone nowhere in Congress.

The main hang-up, though, is how broad to make the plan.

Pearce wants the program limited to agriculture. He said that is the area of the economy most in need of foreigners. Arzberger, the Senate minority leader, said that restriction i unacceptable. She said there are other industries that are unabl to fill certain jobs with legal U.S. workers.

“We’ve got small businesses that are in danger of leaving th state,’’ she said. “We’ve got other industries that need these workers.’’

“It’s just not true,’’ Pearce responded. He said if U.S companies “pay the right wages they will get the right workers.’’

Pearce said he believes farmers have made a showing they are unable to get workers in a timely fashion to harvest their perishable products are perishable and cannot wait.

“I can’t support importing workers when we’re having Americans laid off,’’ he said. Pearce cited the construction industry in particular.

The latest figures from the state Department of Commerce show another 1,900 jobs were lost between January and February. And the 203,900 people working in construction in February is 30,500 less than two years earlier.

He said the “free market economy’’ should be allowed to work, with the value of labor based on what it takes for companies to attract qualified people.

“They have to say that, ‘We have taken these steps to locate local workforce and nobody has applied, nobody’s answered our ads,’ ‘’Arzberger said.

And Arzberger said this isn’t designed to help the fast-food industry and others looking for low-skilled workers but wanting to keep their labor costs down. She said the owner of a steel fabrication firm is offering $50 an hour for qualified workers “and he still can’t get them.’’

Pearce also complained of what he sees as a loophole that could lead to more undocumented workers in this state.

and country.

He noted the legislation allows the state Industrial Commission,

which would issue ID cards to foreign workers, to revoke those

cards if the person disappears. That act, he said, is largely

meaningless once someone is in this country and can simply walk

away from a job and disappear.

Pearce said employers who bring foreign workers into this country

should be required to put up a bond.

A 2006 report by the Pew Hispanic Center found that at least a

third of the people in this country illegally actually got here

legally.

It concluded that somewhere between 4 million and 5.5 million

current unauthorized migrants got legitimate visas to enter this

country and simply never went home when the vistas expired.

That’s out of an estimated 11.5 to 12 million illegal immigrants

now in the country.

Another 250,000 to 500,000 had border crossing cards - permits

that allow them to come here legally for short visits to shop or

work - but also chose to stay indefinitely.

By contrast, anywhere from 6 million to 7 million entered

illegally, many through the Arizona desert, and successfully

evaded the Border Patrol, the report says.

Even if the measure is approved it may never take effect.

Arzberger acknowledged that only the U.S. Department of Homeland

Security can decide who to admit to the country and whether to

honor any temporary worker ID cards issued by the state. She said

there have been some preliminary discussions with the federal

agency.

Russ Knocke, press aide to Homeland Security chief Michael

Chertoff, said he could not comment specifically on the Arizona

proposal. But he said the fact Arizona is pushing ahead with its

own plan shows the need for Congress to approve a comprehensive

immigration reform proposal, one that also deals with the labor

needs of U.S. companies.

“Absent that reform, there’s still going to be a heavy burden on

our frontline personnel, Knocke said. He said the current

situation results in a “tremendous economic pull for illegal

workers and a push back from criminal groups as they feel the

squeeze from tighter enforcement.’’

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750