High school students will have a chance to bolster their AIMS scores

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Friday, April 4, 2008 2:45 PM MDT


 PHOENIX — Moved by the pleas of a Scottsdale high school senior, a Senate panel voted Wednesday to give all future high school students a chance to use their grades to bolster their AIMS scores.


 The 4-2 vote came after Maria Camri, a student at Saguaro High School, explained how she has passed the reading and writing portions of the test but is still unable to get a passing grade in math despite taking the test four times and getting outside tutoring. Camri, who said she is just two points short, said she should be allowed to use her grades — she has a 3.2 average — to boost her math score and let her graduate this spring with her classmates.

 With the House already having approved HB 2008, the measure now needs just full Senate approval — and consent of the governor — to become law.

 The state has administered the test, better known as Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards, for years. But it only was with the Class of 2006 that passing all three parts became a condition to get a diploma.

 Lawmakers did agree to allow students who have at least a C in all their courses to use their grades to supplement their AIMS scores by up to 25 percent. Those bonus points do make a difference: State School Superintendent Tom Horne said about 3,000 seniors would not have passed AIMS — and not have graduated in each of the last two years — without the bump.

 But the temporary reprieve expired in December, leaving Camri — and others in the Class of 2008 and beyond, relying solely on passing AIMS to graduate.

 Sen. Linda Gray, R-Glendale, questioned the advisability of bonus points. She noted that Camri said she wanted to be a lawyer. And Gray got the senior to admit that she shouldn’t be able to practice law unless she gets a passing score on the state Bar exam. Camri, however, said this is different, shown at least in part by her 3.2 grade point average. “I have worked my, excuse my language, my butt off to get where I am right now today,’’ she told Gray.

 Camri also said she has taken the math test every time it has been administered as well as tutoring, both of which are requirements in the old law — and would be in the new version — to using bonus points. “And, by the way, the state did not provide tutoring,’’ she said, after the Department of Education ran out of cash. “So I had to pay out of my own pocket.’’

 Sen. Victor Soltero, D-Tucson, said he understands her problem. “Some people just have a hard time taking tests,’’ he said. “Some people have a hard time with the subject of math,’’ Soltero continued, saying that isn’t a fatal flaw. “In the future they move on to do great things.’’

 And Sen. Tom O’Halleran, R-Sedona, said students should not be penalized for what he believes is an underfunded education system.

 Gray, however, remained unconvinced. “Throughout life you have to pass tests,’’ she said, noting that people can’t become beauticians or certified mechanics without getting a passing score. And Gray said students have had 12 years to prepare for the test.

 Sen. John Huppenthal, R-Chandler, said providing a permanent bonus point system “essentially guts AIMS.’’ He said the academic standards, which form the basis of the test “are not incredibly difficult.’’

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750