BP agent’s retrial is slated for Sept.

By Jonathon Shacat
Wick News Service
Published/Last Modified on Friday, April 4, 2008 3:05 PM MDT


BISBEE — A federal judge has postponed Border Patrol Agent  Nicholas  Corbett’s new murder trial until September.


Corbett is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide for fatally shooting Francisco Dominguez-Rivera, a Mexican who was illegally entering the Unites States near Naco last year.

A second trial was scheduled for April 22. However, in an order dated Wednesday, Judge David Bury agreed to postpone the trial until Sept. 9.

Lead defense attorney Sean Chapman filed a motion last week in U.S. District Court in Tucson seeking to postpone the trial until Sept. 9. He said counsel currently has multiple trial settings in April and May that were previously delayed in order to try the Corbett case in February and March.

Prosecuting attorneys joined in the motion and agreed the continuance is necessary.

Bury’s order states that a change in plea must be heard by a magistrate judge by Aug. 22. Also, motions or stipulations to continue the scheduled trial date and change of plea hearing must be filed with the court clerk by Aug. 29.

The first trial was held Feb. 26 to March 7. Bury declared a mistrial because the 12-member jury was deadlocked.

Special prosecutor Grant Woods said he was recently contacted by a man claiming to be “familiar with the deliberations” who said the vote was 10 to 2 guilty versus not guilty.

Woods does not know which charge the majority felt Corbett was guilty of.

“No idea of credibility, although others claim to have heard the same thing,” Woods said.

Chapman declined to comment on the jury’s vote by saying, “I’m back in trial prep mode and won’t be commenting again until after the trial.”

Corbett testified he acted out of self-defense when he shot Dominguez-Rivera. Prosecutors said the shooting was not justified.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750