A famous church historian on politics, religion


Published/Last Modified on Saturday, April 5, 2008 3:06 PM MDT


When it comes to religion and politics, it’s hard to talk about the contests without naming the players and their teams.


Consider Hillary Rodham Clinton, who insists that her political convictions are rooted in her United Methodist faith. Then there is Barack Obama and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ. Enough said.

What about John “Faith of My Fathers” McCain, an Episcopalian who worships with the Southern Baptists? Soon, he will pick a running mate. Do you prefer Mitt Romney, who served as a Mormon bishop, or Mike Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister?

But to see the big faith-and-politics picture, it helps not to focus on the details. That’s why the famous church historian Martin Marty, speaking early in this year’s topsy-turvy primary season, elected to do the near impossible — deliver a 45-minute lecture on this hot-button topic without mentioning the name of a single candidate.

“Won’t that be a relief?” asked Marty, speaking at Palm Beach Atlantic University in South Florida.

The alternative is to cause yet another shouting match in the political pews. Tune in to the typical talk-TV politico, he said, and “as soon as there’s a label as to whether she or he is representing a candidate or party or whatever, you know what they are going to say and it ends there.”

Right up front, Marty admitted that he has been a doorbell-ringing political activist since 1949, and he still calls Harry Truman “my president.” Also, the intersection of religion and public life has been a major theme in many of his 50-plus books and the weekly columns he has published for 50 years in the Christian Century, a mainline Protestant journal.

Truth is, he said, it’s impossible to study American history without noting the role that religion has played in politics and culture. Since Day One, America has offered a powerful blend of evangelical revivalism and enlightenment rationalism, and believers on both sides of the aisle have followed their heads as well as their hearts.

This faith factor isn’t fading, as American life becomes more pluralistic and complex. Once, America was a Protestant, Catholic and Jewish nation.

Now, it is a “Protestant, Catholic, Jewish and Muslim nation — and much more,” said Marty.

But one thing America certainly isn’t is “secular,” and there is no evidence whatsoever that the power of religion is fading in the world as a whole. Marty said this reality is hard for many scholars and journalists to accept, especially those influenced by studies in the 1960s that guaranteed a 21st-century world that would be “secular, sensate, epicurean, hedonistic, contractual, pragmatic, programmatic and empirical.”

“That model didn’t work for most people” around the world, he said, and it “doesn’t work for any of us” in America.

These days, religious believers on both sides of the aisle continue to be shaken by aftershocks from the school-prayer decision in 1963 and Roe v. Wade in 1973. The Iranian crisis in 1979 cracked the shell of America’s sense of safety and security, which later was shattered by the hellish reality of Sept. 11, 2001.

Marty said it’s hard to discuss national “security” without talking about religion. That’s also true when it comes to debating an issue that “starts on Page One of the Bible,” which is caring for creation and the environment.

Then there are the issues linked to what he called the “care of the other,” including health, education, welfare and immigration. Religious believers also are worried about the state of American culture, yet it’s hard for them to find common answers to questions such as, “What is beautiful?” “What is true?” “What is good?” “What is noble?” “What is ugly?” Then there are all those hot-button issues linked to sexuality, marriage and family life.

All of this keeps seeping into American politics.

The bottom line, said Marty, is that it’s good for religious activists to work in politics but very bad for them to confuse religion and politics.

Believers must, he stressed, remember that the “God who sits in the heavens shall laugh at our pretensions, our parties, our causes, but the same God holds us responsible and honors our aspirations.” And, as for the flashpoint where politics and religion meet, “we can’t live with it, we can’t live without it. ... You aren’t going to get anywhere without dealing, some way, justly with the religious involvement of the people.

 

Terry Mattingly is director of the Washington Journalism Center at the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities and leads the GetReligion.org project to study religion and the news.

Comments

    True Patriot wrote on Jun 23, 2008 12:06 PM:

    " This country was founded upon divine principles and set up by the hand of God through imperfect yet noble men who started a democratic process with balances by which we are trudging along. Let us trudge with honor and virtue of the God of our creation who loves us and desires our well being and that of all His creations. Let us work together, but deny not the gifts from God, but rather embrace them and realize we need each other and to be tolerant and inclusive of all that is virtuous or of good report. (http://scriptures.lds.org/en/a_of_f/1) "

    BobP wrote on May 29, 2008 7:05 AM:

    " Rekigion and politics are different sides of the same issue. So long as people "vote" what they believe it is a very big if not the biggest issue in elections. As in Amaerican politics so it goes in the Israel / Palestine dispute, there are no totally secular answers to belief issues. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750