hahaha wrote on Apr 23, 2008 8:39 AM:

" its funny how u people use the online site to talk smack. I bet none of you would discuss this face-to-face "




Diane Richards wrote on Apr 22, 2008 7:20 PM:

" Seems like a very brutal and uncaring act to shoot somene's dog just because he was found to trip a wash sensor. Would this officer do the same to a human? A child? I think an apology is in order rather than pressing charges. Federal, state & county servants need to keep in mind just WHO pays their salaries and to follow the law & procedure to the letter. Where in his manual does it say to shoot citizen's dogs? "




John wrote on Apr 20, 2008 9:40 PM:

" Just goes to show you that you're a moron when you generalize a Federal Agency that protects this country. BP lives are put at risk everyday and Nelson is lucky he didn't get shot. Funny how some value the life of a dog more than a human being. Especially a human being that is paid and trained by your federal dollars. "




Anti-B wrote on Apr 20, 2008 6:17 PM:

" Are you saying that you wouldn't shoot a dog that was charging at you to attack you? You should read more than the Douglas Dispatch, then maybe your comments wouldn't be as ignorant. "




angry again wrote on Apr 20, 2008 2:15 PM:

" TO B. I hope you have neighbors that own dogs or yours turn on you some day and bite you. You don't know the status of the case but are quick to pass judgement on the federal employee. Typical anti law Douglas resident that makes heroes of the law breakers in town. And before you make more ignorant comments NO I'm not a FED employee just Douglas native. "




B wrote on Apr 19, 2008 3:49 PM:

" I'd attack someone who shot my dog too!!! The agent got what he deserved and is a jerk for filing charges against Nelson. Just goes to show you how "federal employees" use their power. "

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

Name:

Email: (optional)

Comments:

Image Verification: (Case sensitive)   

View All Ads
Place an Ad

Jobs

View All Jobs

Homes

View All Homes

Autos

View All Autos