State looks at expanding jobs that teens can doBy Howard Fischer

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 3:06 PM MDT


 PHOENIX — State lawmakers are weighing whether to let teens perform jobs now considered too hazardous for them by state law as one answer to the complaints by some businesses of a labor shortage.


 Sen. Jack Harper, R-Surprise, has crafted a proposal to remove current legal prohibitions which keep those younger than 18 from working as delivery drivers. Now those who have a license but have not reached that age can drive only if the duties are “incidental to the employment.’’

 A more far-reaching measure would allow 14- and 15-year-olds to work on ladders or scaffolds up to 10 feet in height. That is double the current state restrictions.

 And teens in that same age group could be on ladders 20 feet tall for picking fruit or pruning trees; the current state limit is eight feet.

 The move comes as state senators are preparing to debate whether

 Arizona should have its own “guest worker’’ program. The measure would allow businesses who cannot find U.S. residents to fill certain jobs to bring additional help in from Mexico.

 Harper said he’s not necessarily convinced there is a labor shortage in Arizona.

 “But when our economy cycles and it starts coming back strong we will see a labor shortage,’’ he said. “I think we need to exhaust all avenues of employing Americans before we talk about hiring people from other countries.’’

 And that, Harper said, includes teens willing to work. His amendments would remove some of the legal impediments to companies here hiring those who are not yet legally adults — impediments he said were enacted by “do-gooders in the Legislature.’’

 The proposal is getting a chilly reaction from the president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce who wants lawmakers to adopt the guest worker measure the way it is. Glenn Hamer said there are reasons for the restrictions on what teens can do.

 “Those laws were passed to protect children as well as to protect

 the public, I would suspect, from activities that are not

 appropriate for children to conduct,’’ he said. “I believe that

 most people would feel a lot more comfortable with a 19- or a 20-

 or a 25-year-old performing some of the activities than a 16-

 year-old.’’

 But Harper pointed out that federal law already permits what he

 is proposing, saying Arizona law is more restrictive.

 Farrell Quinlan, a spokesman for Arizona Employers for

 Immigration Reform, has different reasons for objecting to what

 Harper is trying to do: His organization wants SB 1508 approved

 exactly the way it is now crafted, without any amendments.

 That measure would allow an employer who contends he or she

 cannot get qualified workers to petition to recruit employees at

 any U.S. embassy or consulate in Mexico. The decision whether to

 permit bringing in those foreign workers would be up to the state

 Industrial Commission which would review the efforts of the

 company to find employees in this country.

 Foreign workers who are qualified would be given special

 identification cars to allow them into this country.

 Sen. Marsha Arzberger, D-Willcox, one of the architects of the

 measure, acknowledged getting her bill approved and signed into

 law means nothing unless and until there also is federal

 approval. But she said congressional action might not be

 necessary, saying that U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael

 Chertoff has some power to waive various federal regulations on

 who is allowed into this country.

 The measure has drawn protest from some who contend that the only

 reason some firms cannot find U.S. workers is they don’t want to

 pay more. They want ability to import foreign workers should be

 limited to agriculture.

 Harper said his proposed amendments are designed to ensure that

 Arizona firms exhaust all sources of potential workers —

 including teens — before they are importing foreigners.

 “We’re one of the states where do-gooders in the Legislature

 determined that it’s unacceptable for 16-year-olds or 17-year-

 olds to deliver anything,’’ he said, referring to the rules that

 keep teens that age from driving more than 50 miles or for more

 than two hours each day.

 “I don’t believe that a 17-year-old should be preempted from

 delivering parts from the local automotive store, delivering

 pizzas,’’ Harper continued. “It’s imperative that we break down

 the barriers to Americans finding jobs.’’

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750