Do Catholics, evangelicals share similar views of sin?


Published/Last Modified on Saturday, May 31, 2008 3:05 PM MDT


One tough challenge that Catholic shepherds face, Pope Benedict XVI said this past Lent, is that their flocks live in an age “in which the loss of the sense of sin is unfortunately becoming increasingly more widespread.”


The pope has consistently described the forces at work as “pluralism,” “relativism” and “secularism.”

“Where God is excluded from the public forum, the sense of offence against God — the true sense of sin — dissipates, just as when the absolute value of moral norms is relativized, the categories of good or evil vanish, along with individual responsibility,” he told a group of Canadian bishops early in his papacy.

“Yet the human need to acknowledge and confront sin in fact never goes away. ... As St. John tells us: ‘If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves.’”

But there’s a problem at pew level. Many American Catholics who regularly attend Mass simply do not agree with their church when it comes time to say what is sinful and what is not. In fact, according to a recent survey by Ellison Research in Phoenix, if the pope wanted to find large numbers of believers who share his views on sin he should spend more time with evangelical Protestants.

For example, 100 percent of evangelicals polled said adultery is sinful, while 82 percent of active Catholics agreed. On other issues, 96 percent of evangelicals said racism is sin, compared to 79 percent of Catholics. Sex before marriage? That’s sin, said 92 percent of the evangelicals, while only 47 percent of Catholics agreed.

On one of the hottest of hot-button issues, 94 percent of evangelicals said it’s sinful to have an abortion, compared with 74 percent of American Catholics. And what about homosexual acts? Among evangelicals, 93 percent called this sin, as opposed to 49 percent of the Catholics.

The Catholics turned the tables when asked whether it’s sinful not to attend “religious worship services on a regular basis,” with 39 percent saying this is sin, compared to 33 percent of the evangelicals.

In this survey, a Catholic was defined as “someone who attends Mass at a Catholic parish at least once a month or more,” said Ron Sellers, president of Ellison Research. The goal was to focus on the beliefs of active members, as opposed to ex-Catholics and “cultural Catholics” who rarely, or never, go to Mass.

The researchers also collected data on church-attending Protestants, and this group — mixing mainline Protestants and those in conservative churches — tended to give answers that were more conservative than those given by Catholics, but more liberal than those given by evangelicals.

Sellers said his team sifted evangelicals out of the larger Protestant pool by asking participants to affirm or question basic doctrinal statements, such as, “The Bible is the written word of God and is totally accurate in all that it teaches” and “Eternal salvation is possible through God’s grace alone.”

The split between Catholics and evangelicals jumped out of the statistics.

“It’s hard to talk about what could have caused this without doing in-depth research that would let us move beyond speculation,” he said.

“But you can’t look at these numbers without asking: Why are American evangelicals more likely to have a Catholic approach to sin than American Catholics?”

It’s clear that most Americans are operating with definitions of sin that are highly personal and constantly evolving, said Sellers. These beliefs are linked to faith, morality, worship and the Bible, but are also affected by trends in media, education and politics. For example, 94 percent of political conservatives believe there is such a thing as sin, compared to 89 percent of political moderates and 77 percent of liberals.

The declining numbers on certain sins would have been even more striking if the researchers hadn’t added a strategic word to its survey.

The study defined “sin” as “something that is almost always considered wrong, particularly from a religious or moral perspective.”

Note that linguistic cushion — “almost.”

“We had to put that ‘almost’ in there,” said Sellers. “Most Americans do not believe in absolute truths, these days. So if you present them with a statement that contains an absolute truth, people are immediately going to start challenging you and looking for some wiggle room. ... They just can’t deal with absolute statements, and that messes up your survey.”

 

Terry Mattingly is director of the Washington Journalism Center at the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities and leads the GetReligion.org project to study religion and the news.

Comments

    Michael James wrote on Jun 6, 2008 1:55 PM:

    " The disappearance of a sense of sin is really, in the minds of many, the disappearance of sin itself. Its the age old atheist philosophy that "nothing is right or wrong, only thinking makes it so".

    If a culture can dumb down the absolute to the relative, it is only a short walk from there to anything goes " if every one is doing it". There truly is nothing wrong if everyone is doing it. It may be what we like to call "inappropriate" but it's not wrong. "

    Arland Buzz Johnson wrote on Jun 5, 2008 6:28 AM:

    " It is very true that there are a lot of Cafeteria Catholics out there, They only believe in what they want, but believing something is not a sin does not make it not a sin. It is very clear what the church teaches.

    Jesus said that many would take the wide road that leads away from God, but I prefer to take the difficult narrow road that leads to life. It may not be easy, but it is the sure way to life "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750