One adult, two juveniles arrested in graffiti damage

By XAVIER ZARAGOZA
The Daily Dispatch
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 6:09 PM MDT


One adult and two juveniles were arrested for their part in a rash of graffiti throughout town.


Southwest Gas was one of the buildings “tagged” during a rash of graffiti vandalism last week.

Adrian Arturo Torres, 20, was arrested and charged with five counts of contributing to the delinquency of minors and one count of criminal damage and one count of criminal trespass, said Marcus Gonzalez, the spokesman for the Douglas Police Department.

Investigators found that Torres had bought the paint that was used for the graffiti.

The first juvenile, whose name was not release because of his age, was charged with five counts of criminal damage and two burglaries, Gonzalez said.

The criminal damage charges were the result of five separate locations of graffiti.  Police also linked the juvenile to a burglary of the Douglas Visitor’s Center, where a digital camera was stolen.  The second count of burglary was for entering the Huber Middle School to commit the criminal damage.  

The juvenile told police that he would continue “tagging” even if he kept getting arrested.  

Police also charged a second juvenile with two counts of criminal damage for graffiti around town.  Police are continuing their investigation and more arrests are pending, he said.

  Because of the “tagging” styles of the adult and the juveniles being consistent with other recent graffiti throughout the city, police were able to connect them to several other damages.

 Douglas police and GIITEM were closely monitoring the known graffiti hot spots when six juveniles and one adult were found damaging the inside walls to an abandoned warehouse building west of the Douglas Police Department with graffiti.  The juveniles ran from police, but were later apprehended.

   The recent rash of “tagging” is not related to gang activity, but rather to new groups called “tagging crews”.  The “taggers” are not associated with criminal street gangs; instead, they compete with other “tagging crews” in the area on their “artwork”.

Police are urging the citizens of Douglas to report the damage immediately, at the time of occurrence if possible, in order to help curb the crime of criminal damage.  It is the only way to stop these “taggers”, as is apparent by their unruly nature and comments, Gonzalez said.  

 “The community needs to work together to put a stop to the grafitti problem.  It is not only an eyesore, but it devaluates property values and encourages further criminal activity,” Gonzalez said.  

To report any criminal activity call the Douglas Police Department Crime Check at 364-4433.  Tips may be made anonymously.

Comments

    Losing Hope wrote on Jul 22, 2008 1:11 AM:

    " I can't beleive what I am reading. The bottom line is this, tagging is destruction of other peoples property, private or public. I have the perfect solution. All you "artists" out there, go ahead and tag up your own homes and express yourselves all you want. Then, once your parents have kicked you out for destroying their home, you can go to Amber's home and proceed to express yourselves there. I'm sure she won't mind a bit. There are plenty of less destructive media that these "artists" can express themselves with. "

    B wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:24 PM:

    " I agree with amber also, if there was more to do in this town for the kids may be alot of them would stay out of trouble. "

    tag your it wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:58 PM:

    " Graffiti can be costly; nonetheless, it is a form of art. Some children do not intend to cause business owners costly repairs. There are those who choose inconspicous areas in which to place their "drawings". Those children are obviously taking consideration for others. Don't point the finger at the parents. It has been my experience that some parents are unaware of the actions until they are informed.This happens after one has been caught. As a community we should work together to educate the children on the safe and responsible ways of expresing themselves. "

    sain wrote on Jul 20, 2008 2:09 AM:

    " we artists would even be able to paint over the art with house paint to keep clean and put new stuff on the wall if they had a freedom wall a good spot is a ditch next to the call center or the one at the border. "

    avop wrote on Jul 20, 2008 1:51 AM:

    " graffiti isnt bad it is just away to express your self or take your art work to a bigger level. but if there was a freedom wall poeple would see that and understand. "

    CORE wrote on Jul 20, 2008 1:47 AM:

    " if the citizens of Douglas are discusted with graffiti why not build up a freedom wall were we kids and adults paint legally so that we artists can show our skills and host our own events a perfect spot would probably be the ditch that runs between 10 street and 9 street next to the new call center it will lower or even stop alot of graffiti in Douglas and keep us out of trouble. "

    m wrote on Jul 17, 2008 1:59 PM:

    " I agree with Amber. Give this kids something to do and where to do it. "

    sman wrote on Jul 16, 2008 6:49 PM:

    " Hey Amber maybe we should put them in timeout first! "

    JayDee wrote on Jul 16, 2008 4:29 PM:

    " Have the parents of each of the juveniles have to come and work on weekends, or their day's off, painting the walls their kids damaged.

    If the parents cant control their kids "artwork", then they can paint, repair or pay to fix, their childrens talent. Hold the parents responsible as well. "

    Amber wrote on Jul 16, 2008 2:31 PM:

    " Give Them A Wall!

    Why not put up a wall, or let them have part of the large drainage ditch that runs along pan american, Where these kids can put up their "Artistic" abilities? There fore, they can tag over eachothers tags, or have contests, or designated area's for each team, instead of the whole city of douglas? Then, they can show of their artistic abilities without damaging property. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750