Vikings mum on Favre


Published/Last Modified on Friday, July 18, 2008 3:08 PM MDT


MINNEAPOLIS (AP)—The   Minnesota Vikings took a different stance on Thursday in what has become the story of the summer in the NFL: They decided NOT to talk about  Brett Favre.


The Vikings said Thursday they would not comment on allegations by the  Green Bay Packers that they made inappropriate contact with Favre before or during the three-time MVP’s effort to un-retire.

“The Vikings are not commenting on the issue. These types of matters are handled by the league,” said a statement read by a team spokesman.

The Favre saga has overridden everything else going on in the NFL, turning the NFL offseason into a one-story league. Another chapter was added Wednesday night when a person familiar with the Packers’ complaint told The Associated Press that Green Bay has filed tampering charges against the Vikings.

The person, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, said Packers officials believe Vikings offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell had discussions with Favre that would violate league rules. Presumably, such discussions would include the possibility of Favre leaving the Packers for their NFC North rivals in Minnesota.

 “They feel like Favre had something (in place), and that’s why he was so anxious to get his release all of a sudden,” the person said.

Favre and Bevell are friends going back to Bevell’s days as an assistant in Green Bay. Favre retired in March, but has since said that he wants to return, which has led to a messy back-and-forth with Packers GM Ted Thompson.

The Packers told the AP that they were ready to welcome Favre back to the team later in March when Favre expressed reservations about his decision to retire, only to be assured by the quarterback that he was finished. Favre has said that he felt pressured by the Packers to retire and now has been told that if he returns to Green Bay, he wouldn’t necessarily get the starting job back.

Minnesota was immediately mentioned as a possible destination for Favre’s relocation. With a veteran defense and a powerful running game, inexperienced quarterback   Tarvaris Jackson appears to be one of the few question marks for a team looking rise to contender status in the NFC.

The allegations have turned up the heat on what was already one of the most intense rivalries in the game.

Vikings coach Brad Childress called the situation a “soap opera,” and said Tuesday that it has been interesting to watch but he remained committed to going forward with Jackson as his starting quarterback.

But the Packers think the Vikings have had other ideas since Favre held a tearful retirement press conference on March 6.

The team told the league that it believes an investigation of phone records will show more than “normal contact” between Favre and Bevell, even before he formally asked for his release to play for another team.

Bevell and Favre became close friends during Bevell’s three years as quarterbacks coach with the Packers from 2003-05. The two remained in contact after Bevell left to become the offensive coordinator of the Vikings.

Bevell was not available to comment on Thursday and neither were any other Vikings officials, spokesman Bob Hagan said. On the surface, the allegations would appear to be difficult for the Packers to prove using phone records alone. But the NFL has been increasingly diligent in recent years in enforcing its tampering rules.

The  HYPERLINK "http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/sfo/;_ylt=AgV8_kp89tqUZjebQcoPHFodsLYF" San Francisco 49ers were punished this year—forced to forfeit their fifth-round draft pick and swap third-rounders with the Bears in the April draft — after being found guilty of improperly contacting linebacker  HYPERLINK "http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6404/;_ylt=AstABhWR2lQySklXM42oKEUdsLYF" Lance Briggs’ agent while Briggs was still under contract with Chicago in 2007.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said the league only comments on tampering cases if there is some disciplinary action to announce.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750