Would cost DPD $72,589
DPS wants city, county police to pay up

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Friday, July 25, 2008 3:09 PM MDT


PHOENIX — A last-minute deal to balance the state budget could force local police to choose between laying off workers or not pursuing certain crimes.


 The budget which Gov. Janet Napolitano helped craft cuts the state allocation for the Department of Public Safety crime lab by more than half. It also directs the agency to make up that difference by billing police, fire and sheriff’s departments and medical examiner’s offices a total of $7.8 million for lab work that, until now, was done for free.

 And because the budget deal was not made public until late June it also came after cities and counties already had adopted their own budget — budgets which never counted on a new bill from DPS.

 Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever said Wednesday that goes back on what essentially was a promise made when tax dollars were used to set up the crime lab in the first place that the lab would provide services to police agencies throughout the state.

 “I think it’s a little outrageous,’’ said Dever, whose agency would have to pay $137,000 this year under a proposal crafted b DPS. More to the point, he said it could hamper crime fighting efforts.

 “The dangerous part of course is that law enforcement agencies may be in a position because of cost to have to kind of ‘cherr pick’ which cases they’re going to send up to the lab for analysis,’’ Dever said. “A lot of potentially useful information and lab analysis that we get that could lead to other conviction down the road is going to be lost.’’

 Flagstaff Police Chief Brent Cooper, whose agency would need to come up with more than $233,000, said he was particularly upset that no one bothered to tell police chiefs and sheriffs this was even being considered. Now, Cooper said, his department is going to have to figure out how to come up with the cash withou scrapping investigations.

 “I do pledge to the victims of our community that we will do everything we can within our power to make sure that their case are processed properly,’’ he said.

 “We’re not in favor of doing this,’’ said Deputy DPS Director Pennie Gillette-Stroud. But she said her agency was mandated to pass on that $7.8 million cut because the state’s economy has resulted in not enough tax revenues to support all government services.

 “There had to be a way to be able to make attempts to balance the budget for the state,’’ she said.

 Napolitano echoed that theme, citing the $2 billion gap betwee anticipated revenues and expenses.

 “The pain is going to have to be spread in many ways,’’ she said.

 Tom Kelly, a spokesman for the Apache Junction police department called the more than $121,000 hit to his department “devastating.’’

 “I don’t know where the money will come from,’’ he said. “Ther could be layoffs or less city services in public works, the library or public safety.’’

 And then there’s the option of simply ordering less lab work.

 “We can’t tell a family that their family member is less important than anyone else,’’ Kelly said. “It may be a question of `Do we send for blood?’ (or) `Do we go for latent (prints)?’ ‘’

 Even Tucson Police Department, which has its own crime lab, will be hit to the tune of about $91,000 because it sends blood and urine samples to DPS for drug analysis. Sgt. Fabian Pacheco said his agency will have to find the money somewhere to ensure that

 all cases are prosecuted.

 “I don’t think victims should have to pay the price’’ of the

 budget crunch, he said.

 Clint Norred, an officer with the Yuma Police Department said the

 question of what to do next will depend on exactly how DPS

 structures its billing.

 One approach is based on the amount of lab work each agency sent

 to DPS last year. In Yuma’s case that would be more than

 $112,000.

 But another option would be the (ITALICS) a la carte (ROMAN)

 approach, with agencies paying for each procedure requested.

 For example, DPS would charge $87 to analyze a blood sample for

 alcohol and provide the necessary court testimony. Lab work for

 “date rape’’ drugs would cost $330 each, with biological

 screening running between $125 and $500 per case.

 Norred said if that becomes the billing method his department

 will be shopping around to see if a private lab can do the work

 cheaper.

 And Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said his agency, facing a

 potential $354,000 bill, may follow the lead of Mesa and

 Scottsdale police who have set up their own crime labs.

 Arpaio also pointed out that DPS will be operating a new

 statewide photo radar system which Gov. Janet Napolitano has

 predicted should bring in $90 million during its first partial

 year of operation. Those anticipated revenues were not considered

 in balancing the budget.

 “Why doesn’t DPS take some of the money they’re going to make

 with photo radar enforcement and put it to this?’’ he asked. “Why

 now mess with law enforcement and make them pay for crime

 analysis?’’

 The change affects not just police but any agency that needs lab

 work. That includes the Pima County Attorney’s Office which

 sometimes requests DNA or fingerprint analysis.

 “We understand that the state is having a tight year,’’ said

 David Berkman, the agency’s chief criminal deputy. “But we’re

 having a tight year with our budget.’’

 Berkman noted, though, that the anticipated bill for his agency

 is less than $8,000, something he said it will be able to absorb.

Comments

    Leroy wrote on Jul 29, 2008 10:10 AM:

    " Outsource these services "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750