Don’t let rising chicken prices fowl your budget


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 11:57 AM MDT


I have been managing a very tight grocery budget of late. We’re a family of four, including two teenage sons, and we eat most of our meals at home. I want to see how low I can get our grocery bill while still having healthy and enjoyable meals and snacks. I’ve told my family it’s journalistic research but, to be honest, I’m doing it because I think it’s fun.


Over the course of my “research,” I’ve learned that chicken is a great option for the budget-minded, health-conscious cook. Because I plan our meals around featured sale items, many of our meals include some form of chicken, in addition to less-expensive varieties of beef and fish. I’ve skipped high-end cuts of steak and expensive varieties of fish in the quest to spend less than $100 per week on our family’s groceries. Each week, some variety of chicken is featured at our store, so I’ve been able to stay well within our budget.

We’ve expanded our chicken recipe repertoire. We’ve had grilled chicken, baked chicken, roasted chicken, chicken salad, chicken soup, chicken enchiladas and pasta with chicken. But our days of budget chicken may be over, based on what I’ve read in recent business reports.

Tyson Foods recently reported a decrease in revenues due to the rising costs of producing chicken, most notably the higher cost of feeding the chickens. Tyson has not been able to pass their increased costs along to shoppers because there is a relatively high supply of chicken available. Apparently, not all shoppers are following the “creative chicken preparation” plan I am and chicken demand is not increasing as it typically does during a recession. If demand for chicken increased, chicken producers would be able to raise prices.

Even if demand continues at its current level, Tyson warns consumers that the chicken industry will need to pass its costs along to them. I’m not terribly concerned about this because a 10 percent increase in the price of chicken would still be a bargain. Paying $1.99 per pound for sale-priced boneless chicken breasts rather than $8.99 per pound for rib eye steak is a bargain. Having to pay $2.20 or $2.50 per pound for chicken when it’s on sale would still be economical. It’s hard to find any cut of meat or fish that is less expensive and as healthy as boneless chicken breasts. By buying whole chickens or cut chickens, you could save even more. (My husband suggested that we try raising chickens ourselves but I drew the line at that idea.)

As grocery prices continue to rise, nutritionists are recommending savings strategies that help the budget and are healthier for our families. For example, Americans generally eat more protein than they need. We can stretch meat and chicken by serving it along with vegetables, rice, beans or other legumes. Meals like vegetable stir-fry, stews, soups or pasta casseroles can help balance the rising costs of meat and chicken.

I enjoy trying to find suitable substitutions when prices of our standard items go up. For example, instead of using ground chuck in a pasta sauce (sale-priced at $2.99 per pound), I am fine with using fresh ground turkey at $2.19 per pound. My family may not be crazy about turkey burgers, but they don’t mind ground turkey in pasta sauces or soups. To save even more, I check the freezer section to find the same brand of ground turkey at $1.25 per pound sold in the frozen roll. If I plan ahead, I can cut my cost significantly by allowing enough time to simply thaw ground turkey.

Stephanie Nelson shares her savings tips as a regular contributor on ABC News’ “Good Morning America.” You can find more of her savings tips in her book  “The Greatest Secrets of the Coupon Mom” and on her Web site at www.couponmom.com. She can be reached at shoppingmom@unitedmedia.com.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750