Is 18 old enough to drink?
National, state and local debate about lowering drinking age from 21

By Larry Blaskey
The Douglas Dispatch
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, August 30, 2008 3:07 PM MDT


A rising question across the United States asks whether the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18.


Will lowering the drinking age to 18 solve the problem of binge drinking on college campuses or just crete new problems?

Several universities and colleges around the country are supporting the measure because they believe it will reduce binge drinking around college campuses.

Backers of the change believe the rise of binge drinking among adolescents and college students can be directly traced to raising the drinking age to 21. “Just like during national Prohibition, the law has pushed and forced underage drinking and youthful drinking underground, where we have no control over it,” said David J. Hanson, an alcohol policy expert at the State University of New York-Potsdam.

Douglas Police Chief Alberto Melis said he doesn’t understand the need to lower the age requirement for drinking legally.

“College presidents feel they would have more control if the drinking age is lowered to 18. I can’t understand that thought process,” Melis said.

“If passed, a great deal of high school seniors would then be able to drink legally. A n 18 year old might be able to make a good choice while voting, but drinking and driving is a completely different process.”

Changing the drinking age will make it more difficult to enforce and necessitate the need for more checkpoints, he said.

“I can’t see how this is a benefit. All it does is take the problem from the college president’s’ hand and give it to someone else.

“There is a big difference in the decision-making process between an 18 and 21 year old.

“They also have a lot of distractions when they are driving – I-Pods, cell phones and texting – and now we are going to add alcohol on top of that.”

Douglas Unified School District Superintendent Earl Petit said that historically, the district has very little problem with alcohol on campus – only one incident last year.

“Our rules and policies won’t change.  Alcohol is already accessible to 18 years olds. We have just let all the students know that it is behavior we will not tolerate on campus.”

Despite the fact that there would be a number of seniors that would legally be able to drink, he doesn’t see it as a severe impact on the district.

“I don’t expect any real problem. It is just a matter of being more diligent and communicating more with the students about the rules and consequences for breaking them.

Cochise College is an alcohol free campus regardless of student’s age.

There never has been a problem with binge drinking on campus, and Dr. Karen Nicodemus, Cochise College President, doesn’t expect that to change despite a potential lowering of the age.

“Students, particularly those in our dorms in Douglas, understand that alcohol is not permitted and the consequences if they are found with alcohol in their possession,” said Joanna Michelich, Vice President for Instruction and Provost.

In a first instance, students caught with alcohol in the dorms can be put on probation and subsequent infractions could force them out of campus housing.

“Students understand the consequences for having alcohol on campus, regardless of the drinking age,” she said.

Despite the push by some college presidents, national opposition to the proposal remains strong.

“Why would we repeal or weaken laws that save lives? It doesn’t make sense,” said Mark Rosenker, chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. The age-21 laws adopted by all 50 states — under threat by Congress of losing their federal highway funds — have been credited with lowering the rate of drunk-driving fatalities. But critics also question the studies used to link the age-21 law and lower alcohol-related traffic fatalities.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving says lowering the drinking age would lead to more fatal car crashes. It accuses the presidents of misrepresenting science and looking for an easy way out of an inconvenient problem. MADD officials are even urging parents to think carefully about the safety of colleges whose presidents have signed on.

A recent Associated Press analysis of federal records found that 157 college-age people, 18 to 23, drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005.

Seventy-seven percent of Americans recently surveyed by Gallup said they opposed lowering the drinking age.

Comments

    morro wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:23 PM:

    " if they lower the drinking age to 18 it would be total chaos.look right now its bad enough with the age being 21 to drink!there would be an increase in car accidents with dumb teens driving under the influince "

    YOUR MOTHER wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:11 PM:

    " I THINK LOWERING THE AGE LIMIT ON DRINKING IS A GOOD IDEA. MAN THEY SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THIS A LONG TIME AGO. THEY SHOULD EVEN THINK ABOUT LOWERING IT DOWN TO 16 YEARS OF AGE. THAT WAY ME AND MY FRIEND SEBASTIAN CAN DRINK ALL NIGHT LONG! OH YEAH. WHATS UP SEBASTIAN? "

    open your eyes wrote on Sep 2, 2008 2:30 PM:

    " Does it matter? Everyone teen/kid in Douglas drinks, smokes weed, & has sex anyway! If not in Douglas, in Mexico! "

    View the whole issue wrote on Aug 31, 2008 10:42 AM:

    " There has to be consideration of all things that the 18-21 year old segment is held responsible for and weigh restraints accordingly.

    Restrictions from alcohol and participating in the lottery are about the only two things left that citizens in that age group are not allowed. More individuals below 18 are being charged as adults.

    They can sue or be sued, they can vote, they can serve in the military and go to war, they can open up lines of credit.

    At 18 are they full citizens or not? "

    Jay Dee wrote on Aug 30, 2008 3:32 PM:

    " I disagree with the lowering of the drinking age to 18. We have 21 and older who don't know when to stop, don't remember not to drink and drive, and cause some domestic violence issues. Now if the ones who are allowed to drink legally can't take on the responsibilities, What do you think would happen when you get 18 year olds drinking? History has shown that accident, arrests, fatalities, injuries and recklessness will increase. Stop the thinking and get to more important things, such as Eduacation, Jobs and Insurance and protecting our future, our kids. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750