State officials want rural hospitals to develop trauma centers

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Friday, September 19, 2008 2:39 PM MDT


PHOENIX — State health officials are working to get rural hospitals throughout the state to upgrade their emergency rooms to trauma centers.


It will save lives.

But Will Humble, deputy director of public health services of the state Department of Health Services, said Tuesday he believes he has an even better argument: He says hospitals can make more money.

The move comes as the agency tries to figure out how to make a higher level of emergency care available in more places.

The only Level 1 trauma centers are in the Phoenix, Tucson and Flagstaff areas. These are the facilities certified to be able to handle the most severe of accidents.

Humble said there is no way most rural hospitals could achieve that status, given the cost of the equipment and staffing required.

Humble noted, though, there are lower levels of certification, though no Arizona hospital has achieved that. But he said there is no reason to believe that most facilities could not get to be at least Level 4 trauma centers, the lowest level.

He said that doesn’t mean trying to get these rural facilities up to the point where they could provide effective treatment for serious and life-threatening injuries. Much of what that entails, Humble said, is some additional training.

“The real nuts and bolts benefit of becoming Level 4 is you become efficient at resuscitating and stabilizing patients,” he said.

The plan has the backing of Gov. Janet Napolitano.

In her order directing health officials to create more trauma centers, the governor said 60 percent of traumatic injuries occur in rural areas, with injury being the leading cause of death of Arizonans younger than 44.

And Humble said there is data to show that reaching a trauma center in the first “golden hour” after injury markedly increases the chances of survival.

Humble said state law does not give his agency the power to order hospitals to upgrade their emergency room facilities to trauma centers.

He said that’s why health department staffers have been going around the state in hopes of selling it as a way to make more profits.

“There are big business advantages for them,” he said, using data the state already has from the Level 1 trauma centers.

“We’re able to show them how many patients that were injured near their hospital left and were treated down in Phoenix — and which of those actually could have been treated at their hospital had they made the investment to become part of the trauma system,” Humble said.

And Humble noted that hospitals can charge more — and insurance companies will pay more — for services in a trauma center than in a regular emergency room. While finances may convince hospitals to upgrade their services, Humble said the beneficiaries remain accident victims. Ultimately, Humble said the state should have a full range of trauma centers, including those at Levels 2 and 3.

He said a study by the American College of Surgeons concluded that having a full range of trauma centers throughout the state would save between 300 and 400 lives a year. He said, though, those higher levels require more of a financial commitment than many rural hospitals probably can make, especially without the possibility of recouping those costs with higher billings.

The additional financial advantages for the rural hospitals that upgrade actually could mean less revenues for the state’s seven Level 1 trauma centers. Humble said patients treated at a Level 4 facility generally arrive at a Level 1 facility in better condition. And that means quicker healing time and an earlier discharge.

He also said there probably are patients that are “over-triaged,” sent by emergency rooms to Level 1 facilities because the staff lacks the training to know that the injuries are such that they could be treated locally.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750