Latino rights group wants next Homeland Security to agree to halt immigration raids

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, October 18, 2008 8:29 AM MDT


PHOENIX -- The head of a major Latino rights group wants the next president to appoint a Homeland Security chief who will agree to halt immigration raids during the 2010 Census.


John Trasviña wants the next president to appoint a Homeland Security chief who will halt immigration raids during the 2010 Census. Trasviña, president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, told an audience in Phoenix on Friday that an accurate count of Hispanics will result in a lot more Latino elected officials. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

But Gov. Janet Napolitano, who could be that appointee, is on record as opposing such a move.

John Trasviña told the Arizona Latino Research Enterprise Town Hall Friday that getting an accurate count is critical to electing more Hispanics to office. And the president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund said to do that first requires educating the Latino community about the importance of the decennial count.

"We cannot do that as well as we want to until we know the Department of Homeland Security is not going to be out there at the same time the enumerators are out there, knocking on doors, asking for people's names and who lives at that particular house,'' he said.

Trasviña said a proper count of Hispanics, legal and otherwise, will affect how congressional and state legislative districts are drawn for the 2012 elections.

"If we do our job right, we will have a record number of Latinos in Congress, Asian-Americans in Congress,'' he said, along with gains in state houses.

In Arizona, he said, counting all those who are not citizens -- a figure the Census Bureau most recently estimated at 700,000 out of about 6.4 million residents -- could mean the difference between getting just one or two new seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Trasviña said the chief immigration officer in charge in 1990 and again in 2000 agreed to "back off'' during the count. But Russ Knocke, press aide to current Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, said that idea is a non-starter.

Napolitano, when asked about the idea last year, said she sees no need to slow or halt raids.

The governor acknowledged it is important to get an accurate count of everyone here, legal or otherwise, with everything from congressional representation to federal aid tied to those figures. But Napolitano said the question of raids versus a correct count is a "false dichotomy."

She said the Census Bureau can count heads and then augment those with some of the statistically based methods to go from 'actual' count to 'real' count.'' The governor said federal officials already do that.

Her stance could be more significant than her role as Arizona governor: An early supporter of Democrat Barack Obama, Napolitano has been mentioned as a possible Cabinet pick, including Secretary of Homeland Security or Attorney General.

In his speech Friday, Trasviña had some things he wants from the next president in his pick for that latter post, too.

"We need an Attorney General who will take Latino civil rights seriously,'' he said. Trasviña said he wants someone modeled after Robert Kennedy, who held that post in the 1960s during the civil rights era, "to take over from the uncontrollable and the irresponsible Southern sheriffs.''

He said that provision, known as 287-G, has led to racial profiling by other police departments who have received the authorization. Trasviña wants current 287-G agreements suspended -- including the one being used by Arpaio -- and no new agreements "until we can get some sense out of what's going on with local law enforcement of the federal immigration laws.''

Trasviña said MALDEF is making this and other demands Obama and Republican John McCain to ensure they do more than pay lip service to Latino interests. He said simply promising to ask Congress to enact an immigration reform bill is not enough.

 

Comments

    Brittanicus wrote on Oct 26, 2008 7:37 PM:

    " Sanctuary city, counties & States' should be held accountable and the pro-illegal immigration special interest behind it. File a 'CLASS ACTION' lawsuit in Federal Court. Because these locations are aiding and abetting illegal immigration.

    If I was a wealthy person, a pro-sovereignty, anti-illegal immigrant attorney, I'd go after the Governors, Mayors and elected officials, employers who get caught. They are traitors to the true AMERICAN PEOPLE. The real citizens and the immigrants who waited for years patiently to come here. "

    grumpy wrote on Oct 25, 2008 6:06 AM:

    " Census counters count who is there at the moment. Ileagals don't line up to be truthful at that moment. They say they are visiting or don't live there etc. When you take a census you are directed to write down exactly what you are told and not to write in what you think.....so misinformation is a constant. DO NOT STOP THE RAIDS. Get those who enter with out passport and skill out of here. "

    Trooper47 wrote on Oct 23, 2008 5:19 PM:

    " Let me get this right. This Latino group wants law enforcement to not properly do their job, right? This crap has been going on way too for this to continue. Laws were made to be enforced. Immigration laws are like any other law and not to be trampled on by those who want a free handout. Our cities and counties are going broke and it has to STOP!!!!!! "

    CHARLES WEEKS wrote on Oct 22, 2008 11:17 AM:

    " The head of the latino rights group wants a total latino administration. Then the true american will be in the minority. we cannot let this happen. "

    CHARLES WEEKS wrote on Oct 19, 2008 12:23 PM:

    " WHAT ? THE UNITED STATES OF LATINO'S, I DON'T THINK SO. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750