Arizonans answer governor's call for ideas to balance budget

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Monday, November 3, 2008 11:04 AM MST


PHOENIX — Rescind special tax breaks for business.


Reduce the number of managers.

Increase taxes on liquor.

And keep government vehicles from driving faster than 55.

It turns out Arizonans are full of ideas of how to get the state out of its billion-dollar financial hole. They apparently just needed a way to do that.

That opportunity was created earlier this month when Gov. Janet Napolitano set up what amounts to an online suggestion box. So far about 600 proposals have been received, some to cut expenses and some to raise more money.

A review of a sampling of these by Capitol Media Services turned up several that would be simple to implement, some that would require changes in state laws and some that, for political reasons, are unlikely to get far.

Consider one proposal to repeal a 1994 law that essentially pays businesses to collect the state sales tax.

It allows companies to keep 1 percent of what they collect, up to $10,000 a year. The Department of Revenue figures the state loses more than $22 million a year.

But that measure was adopted by the Republican-controlled Legislature, and signed by Republican Gov. Fife Symington amid stiff lobbying by businesses who insisted they are entitled to be reimbursed for their costs of collecting the state tax.

Repealing it would generate protests from affected firms. And, because of the way the state constitution is worded, it also likely would take a two-thirds vote of the Legislature.

Several proposals suggested hiking the state tax on alcohol — the drinking kind. That proposal, one writer said, would do more than generate revenues.

“The drunks in this state cost us so much money and pain,” he wrote. Fewer accidents means savings on police and medical costs.

Another suggestion that came from outside state government proposed removing all of the plants installed along state roads and replacing them with rocks or stone mosaics. That cuts both the maintenance costs and water bills.

Alan Ecker, spokesman for the Department of Administration, said a related suggestion to stop planting winter lawns in front of state-owned buildings already has been implemented. The only state offices that are going to have green grass this winter, he said, are the ones in leased office space.

A third person suggested delaying the beautification project that will accompany the widening of I-10 through Tucson. She said the painting of the walls could be delayed, with the work eventually done by prison inmates.

An employee at the state Department of Health Service said that the purchase order process being followed requires five sheets of paper before it leaves the office to get paid. She said electronic imaging would save some of that paper.

The proposal to limit state-owned vehicles to 55 MPH also included a plan to lower the maximum speed limit in Arizona to 65 miles per hour — and maybe even to 55 after the election. That would require legislation, as speed limits now are set by the state Department of Transportation based on engineering and traffic studies.

There also were several proposals to cut the number of state workers — or at least the salaries of some of them.

One person who identified himself as a 20-year state employee said there are too many “middle managers” who have received “extravagant pay raises.” Another said it is “time to clean up the extra fat at the top of many state agencies.”

Other ideas include:

• Test all state workers for drugs under the premise that those who test positive will quit and the state won’t have to pay severance;

• Use secure e-mail rather than mailing or faxing documents to taxpayers;

• Reduce the use of outside consultants.

Want to offer a suggestion of your own? go to http://az.gov/oss

Comments

    Disgusted wrote on Nov 4, 2008 8:05 AM:

    " I would not give Janet the time of day let alone ideas that would further her career. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750