Border Patrol union, unhappy with Corbett case, endorses Norm Bradley

By Bill Hess
Herald/Review
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:31 PM MDT


SIERRA VISTA — In a letter released Saturday, the local U.S. Border Patrol union criticized Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever and endorsed his Democratic opponent, Norm Bradley.


Signed by National Border Patrol Council Local 2544 President Edward Tuffly, the letter states Dever “failed miserably in the proper supervision and training of some of his employees.”

Advertisement*

The letter specifically mentions “botched investigations and sloppy police work performed by some of his detectives.”

Dever said the union is unhappy with the work done by the Sheriff’s Office’s detectives in investigating the case involving Border Patrol Agent Nicholas Corbett. He is currently on trial in Tucson for his involvement in the death of an illegal Mexican immigrant who was shot after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

Tuffly confirmed Dever’s point, telling the Herald/Review on Monday that Corbett is on trial because of what he calls the unprofessional investigation done by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office.

The main point was that the department’s detectives never discovered gloves that the victim reportedly was wearing. Corbett says he was threatened by a rock held by the illegal immigrant.

The gloves were not discovered until more than a year later, the local union president said.

While Dever said his detectives did not do a thorough job when they responded to the scene, he also said the union told Corbett not to “cooperate with our investigation or with the FBI’s.”

Dever said there is more evidence that was presented to the Cochise County attorney, and the decision to prosecute was based on more than the gloves.

The union’s seven-member executive board voted unanimously to endorse Bradley after he asked for it. Tuffly said the committee’s endorsement, representing the 1,000-member union, wasn’t based only on the Corbett issue, noting there are other management problems in the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office.

Speaking to those issues was the union’s executive vice president, Brandon Judd, a Cochise County resident and Border Patrol agent.

Judd is the second cousin of the late Jimmy Judd, who for years was Cochise County sheriff and Dever’s mentor. Judd said Dever has mismanaged funds to hire enough deputies, putting county residents in danger by not having enough protection.

Dever disagrees, noting he has used every dollar provided to him by the Cochise County supervisors and other sources in building up the number of deputies in the department.

With ever-tightening budgets, a request for an additional 24 deputies this fiscal year was denied by the Board of Supervisors, the sheriff said. Of the 86 deputies currently authorized, 80 positions are filled and efforts are being made to fill the six vacancies, Dever said.

Judd said in some cases Border Patrol agents respond to county calls and wait up to an hour before a deputy arrives. He said the county would be better served by Bradley as sheriff.

Dever said on some occasions his deputies wait for two hours for Border Patrol agents to respond to take illegal immigrants off their hands. He also said he has built the department up by providing more pay and by adding deputy positions.

On July 1, Dever received the endorsement of the Arizona State Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police, based on a vote of the membership, after Cochise County members of the organization recommended the endorsement.

On Oct. 21, Bradley also received the endorsement of the executive board of Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs Local 7077.

Affiliates of AZCOPS can choose to endorse candidates on their own. For example, Sierra Vista Police Officers Association president Cpl. Anthony Venditto said his group has chosen not to endorse either candidate.

 

Comments

    fed boys wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:23 PM:

    " Guess who is hiding corruption? It is not the Border patrol, it is not DEA or the FBI. the only person saying he knows nothing is Dever. Yet, he fires Hager. Allows him to resign, excuse me, within weeks of DEA and FBI contacting him. Trouble is they had the information in 2005 just as Dever did. Dever did....zip, nada, nothing even after being told by his undersheriff, narcotics officers and deputies that Hager was dirty. Don't beleive it? Read the employees survey. Clear as you can get. "

    To Better Journalism wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:42 AM:

    " The headline is missleading, inaccurate and biased towards Larry Dever.

    Your campaigning is showing. This should have been a paid ad by the Dever Campaign. "

    Bias wrote on Oct 31, 2008 2:40 PM:

    " Read the real endorsement in full and you will quickly see how bias an article this is. The editor here should also be ashamed of printing it without the full endorsement. it is easy to see where , Hess, Vega and this editor stand and it is not for fair and unbiased reporting.. "

    Dever vs. Fed Boys wrote on Oct 31, 2008 1:15 PM:

    " It’s very clear that the Fed Boys are seeking this opportunity to discredit the Sheriff, based on courage to prosecute a Fed Boy. Let’s face it, the Border Patrol is trying hard to win public trust, but statements from Edward Tuffly and Brandon Judd on this edition of the daily news is a dirty underhand political pull in favor of Norm Bradley. I had no plans in voting for either person, but I rather stand with one person to expose cover up and corruption then that to sit with 1000 strong weak boys…crying shame. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750