Brewer to take over top state job if Napolitano leaves for Washington

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, November 22, 2008 3:05 PM MST


PHOENIX — The anticipated departure of Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano would elevate an often partisan Republican Jan Brewer to governor and drastically change the face of government in Arizona.


And it would move it to the right.

Brewer, 64, spent much of her 14 years as a state legislator criticizing the size and growth of government.

For example, Brewer objected strenuously to the budget being adopted in 1992. She called it “reeking and squealing with pork.’’

More to the point, Brewer specifically objected to a maneuver to balance the budget by raiding a host of special funds, exactly the same maneuver used this year in the budget pushed by Gov. Janet Napolitano. Brewer said that amounted to tapping these dedicated accounts to create a “general revenue grab-bag.’’

A year later, now the Senate majority leader, she blasted efforts to expand coverage under the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, this state’s Medicaid program.

“It just eats us for more money,’’ she said of the program, which currently consumes about $1 billion a year of state funds.

“We as legislators want to include more and more things, so it just keeps eating at us like a cancer’’ Brewer explained at the time. “AHCCCS will never be satisfied.’’

And she voted against another proposal in 1995 to further expand eligibility by using tobacco tax revenues.

But Brewer herself supported a special legislative session in 1995 to allow the program to pay for lung and heart-lung transplants.

She also worked closely with then Gov. Fife Symington to control the overall size of the budget, even trying to drum up support for a plan by the governor to veto the budgets of the state universities which he had called “bloated and inefficient.’’ In the end, though, both the Republican governor and Brewer found themselves outvoted, even though both chamber of the Legislature were controlled by the GOP.

Brewer also sponsored various bills to reduce taxes during her time in the Legislature.

In her personal biography, Brewer also takes credit for her time as a Maricopa County supervisor in dealing with a budget crunch similar to — but smaller than — the one now facing the state, saying she fixed the problem while lowering taxes. But one of her foes in the 2002 race for secretary of state said that while tax rates went down, the county actually took in a lot more money because of rising property values which translated into higher tax bills.

As a legislator, Brewer also took on causes unrelated to money.

For example, she backed a proposal to scrap the current “merit selection’’ of judges in Maricopa and Pima counties where applicants are screened by a special panel and the governor has to choose from that list. The system also means judges stand for reelection only on a retain/reject basis and do not face actual competitors.

Brewer also opposed efforts in 1996 to allow doctors to prescribe lethal doses of medicine to dying people.

She also has backed new restrictions on abortion, gaining the endorsement of Arizona Right to Life when she ran for Secretary of State in 2002.

More recently, Brewer sought to use her current position to craft ballot language for Proposition 102 that was favored by those who wanted to amend the Arizona Constitution to ban same-sex marriage. After getting a fight from Attorney General Terry Goddard, the pair agreed to a compromise.

And she introduced a measure to urge Congress to amend the U.S. Constitution to make the burning of the nation’s flag a crime.

She also showed her colors as a legislator from Glendale, opposing a measure to revamp how state highway funds are divided up.

“Pima county is the tail wagging the dog,’’ she complained at the time.

Brewer also is on record as wanting more power for the state’s chief executive, sponsoring legislation sought by Symington to let him fire various appointees who otherwise would serve fixed terms, like members of the Board or Regents. Brewer said that the governor should be able to get rid of people who no longer support his policies.

The idea of Brewer as governor drew praise from Symington.

“She’s very direct and told you how she felt,’’ he said. “People appreciate her candor and strength.’’

Brewer also had a reputation among Democrats for being fiercely partisan as a legislator. But former Senate President John Greene, a Republican like Brewer, said he didn’t see it that way.

“A lot of people mistake her intensity and her passion for partisanship,’’ he said. “I always viewed her as someone who was focused on getting things done.’’

But Brewer certainly did have her partisan moments.

She praised former President Clinton after he pardoned Symington of federal charges of fraud, eliminating the possibility that the former governor would have to be retried after the first guilty verdict was overturned. But she did it in her own way.

“That’s the first thing Clinton has done that’s been right,’’ she said of the departing president. “That (prosecution) was a witch hunt.’’

By Howard Fischer

Capitol Media Services

PHOENIX — The anticipated departure of Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano would elevate an often partisan Republican Jan Brewer to governor and drastically change the face of government in Arizona.

And it would move it to the right.

Brewer, 64, spent much of her 14 years as a state legislator criticizing the size and growth of government.

For example, Brewer objected strenuously to the budget being adopted in 1992. She called it “reeking and squealing with pork.’’

More to the point, Brewer specifically objected to a maneuver to balance the budget by raiding a host of special funds, exactly the same maneuver used this year in the budget pushed by Gov. Janet Napolitano. Brewer said that amounted to tapping these dedicated accounts to create a “general revenue grab-bag.’’

A year later, now the Senate majority leader, she blasted efforts to expand coverage under the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, this state’s Medicaid program.

“It just eats us for more money,’’ she said of the program, which currently consumes about $1 billion a year of state funds.

“We as legislators want to include more and more things, so it just keeps eating at us like a cancer’’ Brewer explained at the time. “AHCCCS will never be satisfied.’’

And she voted against another proposal in 1995 to further expand eligibility by using tobacco tax revenues.

But Brewer herself supported a special legislative session in 1995 to allow the program to pay for lung and heart-lung transplants.

She also worked closely with then Gov. Fife Symington to control the overall size of the budget, even trying to drum up support for a plan by the governor to veto the budgets of the state universities which he had called “bloated and inefficient.’’ In the end, though, both the Republican governor and Brewer found themselves outvoted, even though both chamber of the Legislature were controlled by the GOP.

Brewer also sponsored various bills to reduce taxes during her time in the Legislature.

In her personal biography, Brewer also takes credit for her time as a Maricopa County supervisor in dealing with a budget crunch similar to — but smaller than — the one now facing the state, saying she fixed the problem while lowering taxes. But one of her foes in the 2002 race for secretary of state said that while tax rates went down, the county actually took in a lot more money because of rising property values which translated into higher tax bills.

As a legislator, Brewer also took on causes unrelated to money.

For example, she backed a proposal to scrap the current “merit selection’’ of judges in Maricopa and Pima counties where applicants are screened by a special panel and the governor has to choose from that list. The system also means judges stand for reelection only on a retain/reject basis and do not face actual competitors.

Brewer also opposed efforts in 1996 to allow doctors to prescribe lethal doses of medicine to dying people.

She also has backed new restrictions on abortion, gaining the endorsement of Arizona Right to Life when she ran for Secretary of State in 2002.

More recently, Brewer sought to use her current position to craft ballot language for Proposition 102 that was favored by those who wanted to amend the Arizona Constitution to ban same-sex marriage. After getting a fight from Attorney General Terry Goddard, the pair agreed to a compromise.

And she introduced a measure to urge Congress to amend the U.S. Constitution to make the burning of the nation’s flag a crime.

She also showed her colors as a legislator from Glendale, opposing a measure to revamp how state highway funds are divided up.

“Pima county is the tail wagging the dog,’’ she complained at the time.

Brewer also is on record as wanting more power for the state’s chief executive, sponsoring legislation sought by Symington to let him fire various appointees who otherwise would serve fixed terms, like members of the Board or Regents. Brewer said that the governor should be able to get rid of people who no longer support his policies.

The idea of Brewer as governor drew praise from Symington.

“She’s very direct and told you how she felt,’’ he said. “People appreciate her candor and strength.’’

Brewer also had a reputation among Democrats for being fiercely partisan as a legislator. But former Senate President John Greene, a Republican like Brewer, said he didn’t see it that way.

“A lot of people mistake her intensity and her passion for partisanship,’’ he said. “I always viewed her as someone who was focused on getting things done.’’

But Brewer certainly did have her partisan moments.

She praised former President Clinton after he pardoned Symington of federal charges of fraud, eliminating the possibility that the former governor would have to be retried after the first guilty verdict was overturned. But she did it in her own way.

“That’s the first thing Clinton has done that’s been right,’’ she said of the departing president. “That (prosecution) was a witch hunt.’’

 

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750