BCS standings all shaken up


Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, December 2, 2008 3:15 PM MST


NEW YORK (AP)—A week before the final standings are released and the Bowl Championship Series is already ticking people off.


Oklahoma—not Texas—is headed to the Big 12 championship game with an inside track to the national title game by finishing ahead of the Longhorns in the BCS standings.

Texas’ victory against the Sooners in October wasn’t enough to give the Longhorns the advantage in a three-way tie between Oklahoma, Texas and Texas Tech atop the Big 12 South. And that’s sure to leave many in Austin feeling slighted.

The Big 12 had to use its fifth tiebreaker, best BCS rating, to determine which team will play North winner Missouri on Saturday in Kansas City, Mo.

The Sooners (11-1), who lost to Texas 45-35 in October, barely edged the Longhorns. Oklahoma has a .9351 BCS average. Texas’ BCS average is .9223.

Oklahoma was a point ahead of Texas in the USA Today coaches’ poll and six points behind the Longhorns in the Harris Interactive. The computer ratings preferred the Sooners and that made the difference.

So the Longhorns will be watching two teams they beat play for the conference title, rooting for Missouri.

Oklahoma is second in the BCS standings behind unbeaten Alabama. Texas is third and Florida is fourth.

The winner of the Southeastern Conference championship game between the Crimson Tide and Gators is virtually guaranteed a spot in the BCS national title game on Jan. 8 in Miami.

Oklahoma would earn the other spot by beating Missouri. If the Sooners lose, it could open the door for Texas to go to the national title game, despite not playing for its conference championship.

If voters are squeamish about letting a team that didn’t win its conference play for a national championship, maybe Southern California could get a shot at the SEC champ in South Florida.

The Trojans are fifth in the BCS standings with a game to go at rival UCLA.

The Sooners were behind Texas last week in the BCS standings by a tiny margin. The Sooners actually led the Longhorns in the polls, but a week ago the computers had Texas ahead of Oklahoma.

After the Sooners’ 61-41 victory Saturday night against Oklahoma State— 14th in the latest standings—and the Longhorns’ 49-9 win over lowly Texas A&M on Thanksgiving night, the polls tightened but the computers flipped.

The strength of the Big 12 South led to this new BCS controversy, with the top three teams in the conference each finishing 11-1.

After beating Oklahoma and jumping to No. 1 in the polls, Texas (11-1) lost at Texas Tech 39-33 on Nov. 1. The Red Raiders (11-1), No. 2 at the time, then lost at Oklahoma 65-21 on Nov. 22.

The lopsided loss dropped Texas Tech way back. The Red Raiders were seventh in Sunday’s standings.

After beating Texas Tech, Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops touted his team publicly. But later in the week, Stoops passed on a chance make another pitch to poll voters and said the politicking that’s become a part of the BCS was making more coaches favor a playoff system in major college football.

Brown, maybe sensing that his team was in danger of losing its spot despite the head-to-head advantage, did his best to campaign for his team without slighting the Sooners in several national television and radio interviews last week. Brown was even part of the Oklahoma-Oklahoma State broadcast, doing a telephone interview with ABC’s announcers during the game.

Brown has stopped short of supporting a playoff, saying only that the BCS is flawed.

Brown also lamented the Big 12’s tiebreaker system, which removed the head-to-head element. In the SEC, a similar three-way division tie would be settled by eliminating the lowest rated team in the BCS standings, then reverting back to head-to-head results between the remaining teams.

But ultimately, the Longhorns victory against Oklahoma couldn’t trump the Sooners’ surge over the last two months.

Oklahoma has scored at least 60 points in its last four games, and has won its last five games by at least 20 points each.

Though it’s not as if Texas has been struggling down the stretch. The Longhorns only loss came on a Graham Harrell-to-Michael Crabtree touchdown pass with 1 second left in the game. That was also the fourth of four consecutive games for the Longhorns against teams ranked in the top 11 of the AP poll.

Since losing to the Red Raiders, Texas has won three games by a combined score of 129-37.

 

Comments

    riceboy1 wrote on Dec 7, 2008 3:29 PM:

    " first!

    Florida FTW! "

    Jim Suter wrote on Dec 7, 2008 1:52 PM:

    " In my opinion no team from the big ten or big 12 should be in the BCS championship game because in the past 4 they have all been soundly beaten. We would be better served with a USC, Florida match up to see if we can get a better game who cares if Oklahmoa is running up the score on big 12 opponents. They don't play defense. They will loose by 20 or more I will not watch such a blow out. "

    Big Mac wrote on Dec 7, 2008 1:38 PM:

    " Please, I have heard so much garbage anout OU football I could puke. I couldn't bring myself to watch the Big 12 Championship game. Stoops is a clown. How many Touchdowns can Sam Bradford throw in the 4th quarter versus a local high school girl's volleball team? Come on show some class and quit running up the score and quit running your mouth! One good season out of a 100 does not make a dynasty, but one season of publicly showing what an doink you are, and the lack of class by your program every single chance you get=OU=WhoCares "

    Cliff Dunn wrote on Dec 7, 2008 11:02 AM:

    " You and I know that the BCS champtionship will be Florida v/s Oklahoma. This situation is so stupid. Texas will not be able to play for the national champtionship as it should be doing!!
    .
    Look back this season. Texas beat Arkansas better than Alabama did in all anything you check out. Texas beat Oklahoma in the Cotton Bow,... half way between the two schools. Texas did let Texas Tech have a good first half. But whipped them in the second half. They should have not let up at the end.... "

    flirt and squirt wrote on Dec 7, 2008 10:22 AM:

    " PLAYOFFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

    buckeyes wrote on Dec 7, 2008 9:25 AM:

    " I really fill bad for Texas, But the big 12 is the one that came up with this stupid role so I guess you just will shake your head and blame the coaches in the big 12 for letting the bcs decide which teams play in the championship. "

    stanley green wrote on Dec 7, 2008 8:26 AM:

    " how can usc be left out, i like oklahoma and florida is pretty good but we will not know who is the best. till they play each other. and blame the coaches for who they play all year! put some big games on your scheluded instead of playing weak opponents and waiting on the computer too spit out who play. you have every oppurtunity too play these teams and know, i like to see texas to start the season off .usc, florida, pennstate, instead of playing 3 games against lower level teams. "

    Bob wrote on Dec 7, 2008 7:18 AM:

    " Unfortunetly Texas coach Mac Brown doesn't try to run up the score on teams. He pulls his starters out when the game is in hand in the fourth quarter. Now Bob "Spurrier" Stoops on the other hand, ran the scores up in every game ou played in. College football needs to get away from this mentality.
    Texas proved to be the better team on the field in Dallas. ou played Spurrier ball to sway the voters. Could Texas have done the same, and put 60+ points on the board? "

    W.S. Henderson wrote on Dec 7, 2008 3:35 AM:

    " If some of these teams, such as Texas would say "no" to an invite to a bowl game and America would stop supporting these games until we can flush this awful, senseless system out that is crippling the hearts of many young players and get this thing going the way it should have been for centuries. We are all just talking in circles

    This is the most corrupt system I have aver seen , besides voting for the presidential election!

    Sincerely,
    W.S. Henderson
    Texas Longhorn Fan
    LSU Tiger Fan "

    Windrider wrote on Dec 5, 2008 8:09 PM:

    " Two teams with tied records normally look at common opponents to determine the edge, but when two tied teams have played each other, the winner of the head to head competition has always gotten the nod--so, WHY NOT THIS TIME?? really not fair to the players who deserve better than this BCS! "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   

Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750

Classifieds

View All Ads
Place an Ad

Jobs

View All Jobs


Homes

View All Homes


Autos

View All Autos