Cochise County tries to find $600,000 to cover high court costs


Published/Last Modified on Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:39 PM MST


BISBEE — The Cochise County Board of Supervisors and staff are facing another budgetary challenge in a year wrought with decreasing revenues and increasing costs.


That challenge is to come up with another $600,000 to cover indigent defense and jury duty costs.

During Tuesday’s meeting, Clerk of the Court Denise Lundin and Superior Court Judge Wallace Hoggatt received approval from the county Board of Supervisors for the transfer of $150,000 from the general fund’s contingency to pay for the cost of holding trials.

Jurors receive a $12 per day per diem, plus 44.5 cents per mile, Lundin said.

“For the last two years, costs have been relatively steady. We started out this year with the same steady pace. In September we noticed a sharp spike in trials and brought this information forward to our criminal justice task force. The projections from the judges show this was no aberration,” Lundin said.

As of Tuesday, 41 trials have been held since the fiscal year began, with 106 trial days during that time frame. Lundin said that number is more than double the normal workload.

In an attempt to rein in costs, she has reduced the number of jurors who are summoned to serve.

Hoggatt said the number of felony filings being seen is “unusual.”

“There has been a 25 percent increase in filings, but there is a 100 percent increase in jury trials … We don’t blame anybody for that,” Hoggatt said. “People have the right in criminal cases and in civil cases to a jury trial. The numbers are unusual compared to previous years. … Our calendars into the second half of this year are filled …”

The reason appears to be a combination of factors, including more serious crimes are being committed that require lengthy trials and cannot be resolved in plea agreements. “It doesn’t appear to me to be a significant change in county attorney policies. There has been one minor change in policy, but that really wouldn’t explain this. But I’m left without a good solid answer for you,” Hoggatt said.

County Administrator Mike Ortega told the supervisors at the budget review work session Tuesday that the impact of these expenses will have a tremendous effect on the budget. Paying jurors isn’t the only problem. There’s the costs of defense attorneys for those who cannot afford them. Ortega predicts that fund will be short around $450,000 by the end of the fiscal year. He suggested the county increase salaries of indigent defense attorneys on staff and even hire more since that would cost less than contracting out these services. “We are starting to see an impact on the jail. Our jail overtime costs are up and so are overhead costs. Some of that is due to the vacancies, but some is due to the sheer numbers who are there,” Ortega added. Ortega has planned a meeting with members of the Criminal Justice Task Force to find out what is going on in the system.

“Whether it’s law enforcement folks across the county and the sheriff’s office handing out more citations, or making more arrests, or prosecuting more people, some mechanism has changed,” he said. “I want to understand why this has changed so dramatically. Ultimately, I’m seeing a very significant impact in cutbacks and shortfalls that we did not account for in the budget process.”

 

Comments

    John Moran wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:16 PM:

    " how difficult can it be to print on both sides of paper and when only a draft is needed to print on the back of a sheet used for something else, small things like this can yield to big savings as the court system is a big consumer of paper. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750