Senate panel proposes $300 bonus for seniors

By ANDREW TAYLOR
Associated Press
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, January 27, 2009 3:06 PM MST


WASHINGTON (AP) — Senior citizens receiving Social Security would get a bonus payment of $300 under the Senate version of President Barack Obama’s economic recovery plan.


The $820 billion Senate measure includes tax cuts and spending proposals prepared by the Senate’s two most powerful committees on Friday.

Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., unveiled a $455 billion plan combining $275 billion in tax cuts with $180 billion in spending in anticipation of a panel vote on Tuesday. That measure will be paired on the Senate floor with $365 billion in additional spending sought by the Appropriations Committee.

The Senate plan is likely to grow during committee debates Tuesday and subsequent floor action. The Social Security bonus is a one-time payment. Other provisions in the stimulus measure generally extend for two years.

A House companion measure slated for a vote Wednesday carries an $825 billion price tag, with one-third reserved for tax cuts.

The economic recovery plans combine tax cuts for individuals and businesses, help for cash-strapped state governments, help for the poor and unemployed and direct spending by the federal government. The goal is to infuse money directly into the economy in hopes of bringing the nation out of recession earlier and to keep unemployment from hitting 10 percent or more.

There’s nothing in either measure that would address the foreclosure crisis or provide direct help to homeowners.

The bonus for seniors is but one chapter in the Senate proposal. There’s also a temporary two-year $500 tax cut for most workers and $1,000 for couples, a $2,500 tax credit to help pay for college, tax cuts for businesses and to promote renewable energy, and $87 billion worth of help to states struggling with their 2009-2010 budgets for the Medicaid health care program for the poor and disabled.

A summary of spending items under the jurisdiction of the appropriations panel released Friday evening calls for approximately $140 billion in infrastructure and science spending, including $27 billion to states for highway construction and repair. That’s likely to disappoint backers of road projects.

But there’s also lots of money to build and repair schools and federal buildings such as VA hospitals, bring broadband Internet service to underserved areas, and relieve a backlog of water and sewer projects. The appropriations panel’s plan would touch numerous accounts, from day care centers at military bases to health research financed by the National Institutes of Health.

For the poor, food stamp benefits would go up, while states would get $77 billion in aid for education and $25 billion as a block grant with no strings attached.

Some programs, such as almost $1 billion to combat bird flu, are likely to attract ridicule from Republicans and budget hawks for doing little if anything to create jobs.

The Finance panel plan also would subsidize for two years almost two-thirds of health insurance premiums for the unemployed retaining health care under the so-called COBRA program. It would extend unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless through the end of 2009, increase the weekly benefit by $25 and provide unemployment benefits to more part-time workers. Up to $2,400 in unemployment benefits would be tax free.

Both House and Senate would provide a $7,500 tax credit for middle-income, first-time home buyers who purchase homes in the first half of 2009.

For low-income workers, the measure would make the child tax credit more generous by making more people eligible for refunds if they earn too little to pay income tax. The earned income tax credit for the working poor would be made more generous for larger families.

President Obama wants the bill on his desk by the middle of February. First it must pass the full House and Senate in the next few weeks. Then, the competing versions would have to be reconciled.

To accommodate the $275 billion infusion of tax cuts and even more in new federal spending, the measure would increase the legal limit on borrowing by the federal government by $825 billion, to $12.1 trillion. That means the so-called debt limit will have increased by $1.5 trillion since October.

Unlike the House plan, which moved through several committees this week, the Senate measure is likely to pick up at least some Republican support.

Republicans are particularly pleased with provisions extending tax cuts for the purchase of new plants and equipment and allowing money-losing businesses to claim refunds on taxes paid up to five years ago.

Workers making $75,000 or less would be eligible for the full $500 tax cut, intended to offset the pain of Social Security payroll taxes, with couples earning up to $150,000 and filing joint returns eligible for a $1,000 credit. The benefits would be gradually phased out so that people making between $75,000-$87,500 and couples earning $150,000-$175,000 would get smaller tax cuts.

Unlike the $600 per worker lump-sum rebates issued last year, taxpayers would have less withheld from their paychecks. The idea is that people would spend more on goods and services immediately, rather than saving the tax cut or using it to reduce credit card debt.

Print this story Email this story Bookmark and Share

 

Comments

    m.w. wrote on Feb 21, 2009 12:55 PM:

    " when will the president bring down credit card's high interest rate so people can payoff their credit cards faster and start spending again? It seems that high interest rates and crooked wall street and don't forget the banks that gave us a balloon account that we had asked for a fixed rate and then were unaable to pay bacause it being so high. Our tax money paid them out but instead of helping us to pay off credit card debt and lower the interest rates; they say , sorry ,we can't lend to you even tho you bailed us out. "

    willie wrote on Feb 14, 2009 6:45 PM:

    " I am on ss and 1,2oo per mo.and they bail out banks and wall st.

    maybe the banks,wall st.,d and r live in my world for just3 mo.with what i get.

    let them know how the poor lives and remember who put them there WE ARE REAL PEOPLE ALSO. "

    cece633 wrote on Feb 13, 2009 11:13 PM:

    " does that mean ssi will get $300 too,and if so when "

    chgowhtlady wrote on Feb 12, 2009 2:52 AM:

    " I still say that giving ONLY $300 to Seniors on SS is an insult. Wall St, banks and highly-paid execs can get billions but the American Seniors living on less than $1,000 in most cases, only get $300. If that was several times a year, fine. We've watched those Wall St execs take our 401K's into the tank and they get bailed out. But just as I voted for a change in the presidency, believe me, I will be voting in a change in Senators and Congressmen thank you very much. "

    tcarpenter wrote on Feb 7, 2009 5:57 AM:

    " I agree with G, it seems like small amounts of money (10 billion) could have fixed many diffrent problems and avoided bigger spending (800 billion or more.) While our elected officials make handsom salaries they seem to forget who put them in office. I live on $885.00 a month and Missouri now wants me to pay $125.00 a month for healthcare. Sure...I'll send that check right out. Why can't I send them a check and say "hold it for now, I'm running a deficit." because if they cashed it it would bounce to the moon. If the government want to see the economy get better why don't they make sure every adult is at least making an income equal with the poverty level! "

    G wrote on Feb 1, 2009 7:02 PM:

    " It was understandable of course that the Bush administration did next to nothing to help the 750,000 people who have waits anywhere from a year to over four years to get a hearing to find out if the qualify for disablity benifets. That just the way the Republican party likes to run things. 18 billion in bonuses for Wall street executives, and no chance of a timely benifets for those hundreds of thousands of people who are losing homes, or who cant get health coverage, and cant work - but most of whom would if they could. That's right Mr. Obama - millions of UNPROCESSED disability claims EQUALS hundreds of thousands of bankuptcies, evicttions, and foreclosures - and of course hundreds or even thousands of bank failures. Of course - we understand why Bush didnt give a damn - but Mr. Obama who said "shame on Wall Street" - DOUBLE SHAME ON YOU FOR SAYING NOTHING ABOUT THIS.

    Let me make myself clear - Wall Street does not NEED an 800 billion dollar bailout - The Social Security system needs a 10 billion dollar band-aid.

    Anyone in Congress who wont own up to this simple fact is either and idiot or a criminal - and should be voted out, at best. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750