Education hit hard in new budget

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, February 3, 2009 3:59 PM MST


PHOENIX  Gov. Jan Brewer signed legislation Saturday to fix the current budget, paving the way for lawmakers to start dealing with an even bigger deficit expected next year.


Gubernatorial press aide Paul Senseman said Brewer, who has been governor for less than two weeks, recognizes the hardship that the $580 million in spending cuts will have. Hardest hit is education, with a $142 million hit to the university system, $9 million taken from community colleges and $133 million less in state aid to public schools.

“The governor is very concerned about the effect and impact of this budget,’’ Senseman said. He said, though, the cuts had to be made because of the $1.6 billion deficit in the $9.9 billion spending plan, a deficit Senseman said Brewer inherited from former Gov. Janet Napolitano.

“There’s been some dramatic expansion of government in the last five years which is unsustainable,’’ he said.

Aside from reducing education funding, the plan requires spending cuts from virtually every state agency, including a 4.2 percent reduction in payroll expenses. But it leaves it up to each department to decide whether to fire employees or force workers to take unpaid time off between now and the end of the fiscal year June 30.

Universities will get to decide on their own how to deal with their share of the cuts.

Arizona State University President Michael Crow already has mandated that all workers take at least 10 days off without pay  15 for top administrators including himself  before June 30. But that will save only about $24 million; ASU’s share of the cuts is expected to exceed $53 million.

The University of Arizona will have to absorb similar cuts.

UA spokesman Paul Allvin said the initial plan is to eliminate 600 positions, though he said some already are vacant. Allvin said UA President Robert Shelton also will consolidate 16 colleges into 13, though which ones have not yet been decided.

Allvin said while unpaid furloughs have not been ruled out, Shelton does not think they make sense.

``That helps you for this fiscal year,’’ Allvin said of unpaid furloughs. But he said all indications are that the money is not coming back next year and, in fact, the universities may be asked to cut even more.

Northern Arizona University faces about half that much in fund reductions as the other two schools.

Public schools also are expected to come up with their own moneysaving plans. The only restriction of sorts is a requirement that cuts in personnel be taken from administration “to the extent possible.’’

The package, opposed by every Democrat and a few Republicans, also takes about another $580 million from special dedicated funds covering everything from cleaning up toxic waste sites to making improvements to lakes in state parks. The balance comes from $500 million lawmakers believe will be the state’s share of the bailout package which has been approved by the U.S. House and awaiting Senate action.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Gray, RMesa, said any heartburn lawmakers had from these cuts could pale in comparison with what they are going to be asked to do next.

“The hard work is just beginning,’’ he said, referring to estimates that deficit for the coming fiscal year could hit $3 billion.

“The mountain’s a lot higher to climb,’’ said Rep. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, who chairs the House Appropriations Committee. “But we have no choice.’’

And that, he said, is likely to include further cuts to education which makes up about half the state budget.

Kavanagh said he and most Republicans are unwilling to consider tax hikes, even temporarily, instead of further spending cuts.

“I’m not going down the tax road until the situation is so dire that there’s no other alternative,’’ he said. “And I’m not prepared to concede that at this point.’’

Kavanagh said if it comes to the point that additional budget cuts are impractical, he would rather do shortterm borrowing.

“I think that’s more fiscally responsible,’’ he said. “If it’s short term, then as revenues come back, we will not jump back into excessive spending because we will have to repay the debt.’’

Some of next year’s gap between revenues and expenses could be bridged with additional stimulus funds. Lawmakers hope to know soon exactly how much Arizona will get, and how long the cash will keep coming.

But Rep. Andy Biggs, RGilbert, said it may make sense not to accept everything the federal government is willing to provide.

He said the funds could come with certain restrictions, such as a requirement to use them to expand eligibility for health care programs. Biggs said that’s fine  as long as the cash keeps coming.

“But the programs develop a constituency,’’ he said, making it impossible to halt the program once the federal dollars dry up and state taxpayers need to pick up the tab.

It is possible that this year’s cuts to education could end up being less.

Several Democratic lawmakers claimed during debate early Saturday morning that Arizona’s share of federal stimulus aid this fiscal year actually could hit $1 billion. They were unable, however, to convince the Republican majority to plug that number into the budget now, rather than the $500 million, a move that would have reduced the spending cuts.

But Rep. Rich Crandall, RMesa, said if the final federal package does include more cash for Arizona, he will lead the drive to restore some of the state funding for public schools.

 

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750