Now what?
School board votes down attendance zone changes 3-2

By LARRY BLASKEY
THE Douglas Dispatch
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:07 PM MST


After months of discussions, hundreds of hours of work, and the biggest controversy to hit Douglas in years, it all disappeared with a whimper on Tuesday evening, February 17.


Douglas Unified School District Board discusses about attendance zone problem in special session Tuesday.

The board held a special meeting specifically to discuss the attendance zone problem.

The meeting was held at the Douglas High School Auditorium and was attended by about 75 parents, friends, students and staff members. Prior to the special meeting, the board held a one-hour open forum that allowed people to ask questions and express their concerns to the board prior to the vote.

Following the open forum, the board voted against any change by a 3-2 vote, with Board President Charles Hoyack and members Patricia Lopez and Ed Rivera voting against it and Mario Ramos and Susan Kramer voting for it. The vote came quickly, with no questions or comments form the board members.

The original plan pushed by the school district administration called for four elementary school zones, grouping two schools in each of three zones and leaving Faras as a fourth elementary zone. It would also bring sixth grade back to the elementary level and make Huber the only middle school in the community.

Much of the discussion from the audience was repeats of concerns expressed at the two previous open forums held by the school district.

Those concerns included splitting up siblings, some parents having to travel to multiple schools, lack of communication to parents and moving on the decision too quickly.

During this meeting, parents also wanted a “guarantee” that this change was going to alleviate the problems at the middle school level and improve education of students overall.

Some were also concerned, like Eddie Gonzalez, that this was just going to be a quick fix for the middle schools, and the board would come back next year or the next with another change.

Many thought the change was just too drastic.

“This is a wake-up call for all parents. We need to take ownership, need to take the future of our children back into our hands. We need to be more involved. Simply voting no on this is not an answer to the problem,” said Melissa Ramirez.

So what is the answer?

The district is still faced with issues concerning the middle schools, overcrowding in two of the elementary schools and a school district that has not been rezoned in at least 15 years despite the fact that a new school has been built in the last five years.

The school board’s next meeting is Tuesday, March 3 at the Central Administration Building on 12th Street. Meetings usually start at 5:30 p.m.

 

 

Comments

    former resident wrote on Feb 28, 2009 7:07 PM:

    " It saddens me to see so many negative actions taking place within the district. Parents, board members, and residents of Douglas: take back your school district. I have been keeping up with all that has been going on in my beloved hometown ever since Earl Pettit was hired. As we all know, people have a way of making themselves look good on paper but Earl Pettit is obviously horrible. It is obvious he does not like minorities; how much longer is he going to be allowed to insult and degrade the people of Douglas? Out of curiosity, I did research him and the history he has in Whiteriver. Interesting note, the HR director for DUSD was also in Whiteriver at the same time as Earl Pettit. I smell a rat! Sounds like no one deserves Pettit and his band of outsiders....get rid of them all and get back to what is important - the education of your children. "

    another concerned parent wrote on Feb 28, 2009 6:59 PM:

    " It is amazing that Earl Pettit continues to attack Stevenson and all associated with it. Why doesn't he concentrate on what he gets paid to do! School board members, can you not see that he is nothing but trouble? He needs to go along with his group of administrators and several locals who support him. Long after Pettit is gone, those of you who have brown nosed him will be wanting a job with DUSD. Some of us will not forget those who initially did not like Pettit and have now joined forces with him to destroy the district. "

    Conerned Parent wrote on Feb 27, 2009 9:01 AM:

    " How is reconfiguring the schools going to help the students learn more? Just because you shuffle the students around doesn't mean that they are now going to magically learn more. Seems to me that Mr. Pettit is just trying to make a name for himself and now that his "plan" didn't go through he is now personally targeting our school administration. For all of you that support Mr. Pettit, maybe you should do a little research on him. If his proposed idea works so well, why didn't he implement it in Whiteriver where the schools are configured as he proposed, yet they are still failing? "

    blind wrote on Feb 23, 2009 4:04 PM:

    " this school district is doom because if we do not change the system that is not working the state is coming in and firing all the middle school teachers and the school board is only to one to blame, for not accepting change. "

    what a joke wrote on Feb 23, 2009 3:18 PM:

    " the kids are just too doped up & getting alcoholic symtoms at very young ages. blame the parents! "

    Objective viewpoint wrote on Feb 22, 2009 8:50 AM:

    " Now, I think we need to look at all the existing teachers that have been taken out of the classrooms and put them back into the classrooms. If these teachers are doing a great job, then they need to help by teaching the kids, not helping the directors do their jobs. The district would save money on all the stipends that way. Also, all this out of state travel needs to stop and all the different conferences that these people go to that are out of town. What has it actually brought back to the district? If the middle schools are in so much danger of the teachers losing their jobs then the administration needs to start focusing their efforts there with actions. If there are teachers that need assistance then get into their classrooms and assist them. The AIMS testing is not that far off. If it is the parents that are not sending their children to school and they are missing too much of their education to learn then address that. If the kids are not being cared for, being provided with paper and pencils, fed and given proper attention, then let's address that. All I hear and read in the paper is that people are given pay increase, traveling all over, and no one is addressing coming in and working with the students directly or helping the teachers help the kids. Am I way off? I don't read that these people that are paid the stipends have made any impact or that they have done anything. Do they report back to the board at all? "

    citizen wrote on Feb 21, 2009 2:52 PM:

    " here we go again! throwing the blame on each other. for starters i think mr. petit had the right idea of wanting to redistrict the schools, he just didnt make a good and honest presentation. and shame on the board members for having personal feelings and allowing personalities get in the way of doing the "right thing" for the studens of our district. I feel that all of the board members even though there are volunteer should be meeting with mr. petit and trying to come up with some kind of solution to our problems. the staff, students and community need to be better informed of happenings in this matter. and what does eddie gonzales know he and his family have been scams for years, we dont need to listen to those ideas "

    Chuck wrote on Feb 20, 2009 6:41 PM:

    " Please bring Gail back, she would know what to do; she was the epitome of micromanagers. "

    Cup-o-Joe wrote on Feb 20, 2009 4:56 PM:

    " The district did not lose funding because of the restcontructing not passing.

    It is losing money because of the economy.

    The state is not taking over the schools.

    The specific problem needs to be identified and addressed.

    Has the superintendent actually said what the problem is at the junior highs?

    If there are too many students at certain schools than maybe the boundry lines need to change and not have kids attend school that are not in their area.

    Parents need to make sure their kids GO to school because that is how the school gets its money.

    What happened to common sense and honesty? Why dosen't the district update their website with this kind of information?

    Since this reconstructing is over, maybe they can get back to theri jobs, or if they could tdo this and their job at the same time maybe we have too many administrators. "

    Douglas resident wrote on Feb 20, 2009 9:14 AM:

    " Now what? The School Board should continue to explore this problem. Mr. Petit should have learned more about the Douglas schools before attempting to make drastic changes. He has told school administrators that they don't fit into the community and will be terminated. Maybe it is time, Mr. Petit take a good look in a mirror and assess what he can give to the community (if anything at all). "

    Concerned Citizen wrote on Feb 20, 2009 7:06 AM:

    " Now what is the question of the year. Did anyone bother to tell the board members that the funding that would be lost when they voted agaisnt this motion would have a DIRECT impact on the salary fund? NO.

    How on earth are we supposed to fix our broken system when we won't be able to afford to hire or KEEP experienced teachers?!

    Something needs to be done and it needs to be done NOW. "

    m wrote on Feb 19, 2009 5:20 PM:

    " THERE HAS NOT BEEN A CHANGE IN THE SCHOOL ZONES BECAUSE THERE HAS NOT BEEN A REASON TO. THE NEW ADMINISTRATION JUST WANTS TO GET ATTENTION! "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750