Arizona speeders can buy their way out of Driver’s School

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:19 PM MDT


PHOENIX — Got a traffic ticket? Don’t want to pay it or spend four hours in driving school?


Help may be on the way.

A provision buried in the package of bills for the 2010 budget would let errant motorists essentially buy their way out of trouble. They could pay a flat fee of $282 and walk away, with no ticket, no record — and no time lost.

The plan cleared its first hurdle this week when the Senate Appropriations Committee approved SB 1028. That legislation makes a series of changes in laws dealing with the criminal code, ranging from surcharges on criminal fines to a mandate to the Department of Corrections to seek bids to get a private firm to run three of its prisons.

And on page 17 of the 35-page bill, which awaits action by the full Senate, there is the new language about defensive driving schools.

How much extra it would cost to buy out of traffic school depends on where a motorist was ticketed.

Someone stopped in most Maricopa County communities could pay as little as $150 for the four-hour course, including all the necessary surcharges. In Tucson, by contrast, fees range from $205 to a maximum of $255; motorists ticketed in Flagstaff could be charged as much as $235.

Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who chairs the Appropriations Committee, defended the provision.

“If you really look at defensive driving schools, there’s no empirical evidence they do any good,’’ he said.

Arizona law says motorists cited for most violations have three options: Plead innocent and go to trial, plead guilty and pay the fine, or pay to go to defensive driving classes.

Successful completion of the class — which essentially means staying awake — wipes out the citation. Potentially more significant for some, it also means no points against the motorist’s license. And the ticket is not reported to insurance companies who could use the incident to hike premiums or cancel coverage.

There are limits. Motorists involved in criminal traffic offenses like drunk driving or speeding 20 miles or more over the limit are ineligible, as are those who get into accidents that cause death or serious injury.

And drivers are eligible to wipe out the tickets this way only once every 24 months.

Pearce said not everyone who gets cited needs to go to class.

“One ticket for 11 (miles per hour) over in 40 years does not make one a bad driver,’’ he said.

And Pearce said if the aim of the classes is to deter people from breaking the law in the future, making them pay a stiff penalty is just as effective as making them sit through four hours of lessons.

“We’re just going to abuse your afternoon,’’ he said. “Instead of being at your kid’s T-ball game, we’re going to make you sit your heinie in a class Saturday.’’

Some other legislators don’t see it that way.

“So if you’re rich, you can buy your way out?’’ asked Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix. “That is not fair.’’

Sinema said she attended one of those schools after getting a photo radar ticket. Did it make her a better driver?

“I think so, although I think a large part of my becoming a better driver also comes with age,’’ she said. “I’m still not a great driver, I’ll be very honest.’’

Rep. Frank Antenori, R-Tucson, also has been to traffic school, having been clocked by a Tucson police officer driving eight miles per hour over the speed limit. But Antenori, vice-chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, said he doesn’t think the experience made him a better driver.

Despite that, Antenori said he’s not sure that people should be able to buy their way out of having to sit in the class.

He said maybe that should be an option for someone speeding just a little over the speed limit.

Antenori said the motorist likely knew he or she was speeding and won’t learn anything new.

But someone who “blows through a red light’’ and endangers someone else, he said, should not have that option.

Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Gilbert, said he doesn’t think the ability — or willingness — to pay an extra fee should determine who does and does not have to go to traffic school.

Biggs said, though, he might be willing to consider an alternative scheme which would require that all students be given a test of their knowledge of traffic laws at the beginning of a class. Anyone who scored 100 percent would be able to walk away without having to sit through the next four hours, though that person would still pay the fee.

 

Comments

    Guy Smith wrote on May 27, 2009 10:49 PM:

    " Revenue laws are what they should be called,instead of traffic violations.Because if they are traffic violations,then we have a lot of city police that are violaters.I drive so many times behind or next to a police car that is cruising down the road doing 10 to 15 mph over the posted speed limit,and I have never once seen them in traffic school,or traffic court.unless they are there to help prosecute a revenue law breaker. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750