Law enforcement slams Ariz. concealed gun bill


Published/Last Modified on Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:33 PM MDT


 


PHOENIX (AP) — Law enforcement officials on Thursday said public safety would be put at risk by proposed legislation that would allow Arizonans to carry concealed weapons without state permits and allow those with permits to take concealed weapons to schools when picking up and dropping off students.

State Sen. Sylvia Allen, the bill’s sponsor, said public safety would be enhanced, not diminished, if her bill becomes law, particularly in the state’s urban areas.

One of several gun-rights measures advancing in the Legislature, the bill would replace the current misdemeanor for carrying a concealed weapon without a permit, with one prohibiting use of a concealed weapon for violent or other serious crimes.

The bill (SB170) proposed by Allen of Snowflake and 21 other Republican lawmakers is scheduled to be considered Friday during a special meeting by the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of a crush of bills now being considered in the wake of legislative approval of a new state budget.





State Attorney General Terry Goddard and a dozen county and municipal law enforcement officials said the lack of now-required permit training could heighten tension in everyday situations. The training includes advising that permit-holders announce possession of a concealed weapon during police encounters, officials said.

If the bill becomes law, officers “have to treat every single person that they come in contact with as armed and dangerous,” said Jack Harris, Phoenix public safety manager.

Allen scoffed at that argument, saying that criminals will continue to carry concealed weapons, with or without a permit. She said she is sponsoring the bill because residents have a right to defend themselves and shouldn’t have to put up with burdensome permit requirements.

“This is to protect our citizens,” she said.

Allen said she would never suggest that people not get the now-required training on firearms law and testing for familiarity and accuracy of an applicant’s weapons use, but that it shouldn’t be a state requirement.

Law-abiding citizens also shouldn’t be banned from school property to pick up and drop off students just because the adults have a gun in their possession for self-protection, she said.

“They’re law-abiding citizens. They’re not out to do any harm,” she said.

The state constitution provides a right dating from statehood in 1912 to bear arms for defense, and it’s legal in Arizona to carry a gun openly, as in a hip holster.

A state law from 1994 allowed residents 21 and older to carry a gun concealed if they get a state permit, which Goddard called “a special privilege.”

He said Allen’s bill would apparently apply to people as young as 18.

“That’s putting the entire community at an unnecessary risk,” he said. “I think we’ve added significantly to the population and perhaps to the danger, and that’s what our concern is.”

The current Legislature has been mostly friendly to gun-rights proposals, but opposition from law-enforcement officials makes the concealed-weapons bill controversial. The likelihood of its passage wasn’t immediately known though, as many bills could be snagged by time constraints and lingering uncertainty about the state budget.

On the Net:

Arizona Legislature, http://www.azleg.gov

Department of Public Safety FAQ, http://ccw.azdps.gov/faq.asp




Comments

    JIm wrote on Jun 23, 2009 5:19 PM:

    " This is absurd. Just another pathetic attempt by republicans to get campaign donations from the NRA. "

    John wrote on Jun 23, 2009 4:21 PM:

    " It really does not matter. Criminals do what ever they want. Honest Citizen can only obey the laws. Terry Goddard has constant DPS Protection where ever he goes. As a lawyer he will always have a right to have a weapon as an officer of the court. Just as all law enforcement will alway have their gun. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   



Classifieds

View All Ads
Place an Ad

Jobs

View All Jobs


Homes

View All Homes


Autos

View All Autos

Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750