GOP ready to give in on Brewer’s sales tax vote

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:01 PM MDT


PHOENIX -- Some Senate Republicans appear ready to give Gov. Jan Brewer what she wants: Ask voters if they want to hike the state sales tax -- and then hope it fails.


At a caucus meeting Monday, Senate President Bob Burns, R-Peoria, said Brewer has said the one main thing stands between the state and a budget for the current fiscal year she can sign is putting the issue of a temporary one-cent hike in the 5.6 percent sales tax rate on the November ballot. "We haven't been able to move her off of that.''

The Republican-controlled Legislature refused, however -- twice -- to send that to her. And she has, in turn, used her power of line-item veto to kill some of their priorities, including sharp spending cuts, raising money by putting prisons in private hands and cutting taxes elsewhere.

Sen. Barbara Leff, R-Paradise Valley, told colleagues enough is enough. She said it's time for Republicans to vote to refer the issue to voters.

"If we do not in fact put that package together, we are going to be causing a property tax increase on everybody,'' she said. That's because one of the bills Brewer vetoed contained language permanently repealing the state property tax.

It was suspended in 2006 when the state had a surplus. But it returns automatically this fall unless lawmakers vote otherwise and Brewer signs the change into law.

"So we sit here and act really pure that we're not going to refer something to the ballot to allow the voters to decide whether or not they want to do the one-cent sales tax,'' she chided her colleagues. "Or we can allow everyone to be taxed without any choice.''

Other Republicans said they are coming around to the belief they should put the sales tax issue on the ballot.

"The governor is so intransigent on her sales tax referral,'' said Sen. Al Melvin, R-Tucson. What probably makes the most sense, he said, is for GOP lawmakers to use that as an opportunity to get some of what they want.

What Melvin wants is to put another measure on the same ballot to fully or partially repeal a 1998 constitutional measure which limits the ability of lawmakers to alter any voter-approved mandate.

Sen. John Huppenthal, R-Chandler, said Republican legislators should see Brewer's insistence on a sales tax vote as an opportunity.

"Sometimes you have to take advantage of the energy that's coming against you to achieve victory,'' he said.

"The likelihood is, it's going to lose,'' Huppenthal said of a public vote on higher sales taxes. "So if you use this energy to achieve some real reforms, that's a bird in the hand.''

But Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City, chided his colleagues for being willing to compromise their beliefs that higher sales taxes are a bad idea.

"If you guys need to run other stuff along with it to provide cover for yourself for voting for it, then you're going to do what you're going to do,'' he said. "But i'm not going to support it, no matter what.''

And Gould said they run the risk of being tricked.

"I have no faith that the governor's a woman of her word,'' he said.

The discussion on the sales tax vote came before Republicans went behind closed doors for what Majority Leader Chuck Gray, R-Mesa, said were discussions about "how our leadership team is functioning.'' He said that fits the legal exception for "organizational'' meetings.

But the full wording of that exception actually is for  except "organizational meetings to elect officers of the caucus,'' something that was not done Monday.

 

Comments

    TAX PAYER wrote on Jul 19, 2009 10:14 PM:

    " Az needs to get this woman out of office and get someones who responds to us, the tax payers. Jane B is a stubburn old hag and is oblivious to the majority of arizonans who cannot afford a tax increase. We are the highest taxed state in the nation. We NEED to get this woman out of office! "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750