County approves added fee for copying of documents
Extra money to fund storage, retrieval system

By Shar Porier
Wick News Service
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, September 2, 2009 1:10 PM MDT


BISBEE — Starting Oct. 19, people recording or copying documents at the county recorder’s office will pay an additional $4 surcharge.


The increase was approved during Tuesday’s Cochise County Board of Supervisors meeting in a 2-1 vote, with Supervisor Richard Searle in opposition.

“I have an issue with it. I understand the need for it, but we are passing a tax,” noted Searle.

The fee increase was proposed by the county Assessor Phil Leiendecker to cover costs for a new software storage and retrieval system.

The system will replace the one now provided by the Arizona Department of Revenue. The state will stop providing the system in 2012.

“This is the best choice in our opinion,” Leiendecker said. “With the recent approval of the purchase of hardware and software from Colorado CustomWare Inc. to convert all Arizona Department of Revenue files to a locally operated assessor information system, consideration was again given to adopt the surcharge to pay for that purchase.”

The $605,093 software package was approved by the supervisors during the 2009-2010 budget talks, Deputy County Administrator Jim Vlahovich said.

The fees would provide an additional $10,000 or more per month, so though it will take some time, the county will pay for the system in about five years.

Delay sought

County Recorder Christine Rhodes asked the supervisors to delay tacking on the new surcharge until Dec. 1 so she would have ample time to notify customers — many of whom are out of state — through mass mailings, email notifications and public service announcements.

That delay would cost about $15,000, Supervisor Pat Call said.

He and Supervisor Ann English voted in favor of commencing the new surcharge Oct. 19.

 

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750