Two sides to Douglas Port expansion story

By Jonathon Shacat
Wick News Service
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:25 PM MDT


The Mexican consul here is criticizing the city’s mayor for some remarks he made during recent media interviews about the proposed expansion of the Douglas/Agua Prieta port of entry.


Oscar de la Torre, Mexican consul in Douglas, said Mayor Michael Gomez’s statements were “unfortunate” and “erroneous” when he pointed out Mexican authorities are responsible for delaying the project.

He referred to an article, written by the Douglas Dispatch on July 29 and republished by the Herald/Review on Aug. 3, in which Gomez stated that federal funding was supposed to occur in 2011 but has been pushed back to 2012.

“Part of the problem is in Mexico where there is political fighting over where the new port should be — at the existing port site on Pan American or moved over closer to Kings Highway,” the article states.

“Until a final decision comes from Mexico on its location, it is going to be difficult to get a funding commitment. Right now, we are waiting for a letter of support from Mexico City,” it continues.

Gomez allegedly made similar statements last week during an interview on the Douglas KDAP-FM 96.5 radio station.

De la Torre said it is up to the U.S. government to support the city of Douglas. The Mexican government, meanwhile, must support the city of Agua Prieta.

A proposal to expand the port at its current location in the city is being considered. But the idea of building the port out in the county at Kings Highway is not even on the table at this time, he added.

“On the Mexican side, we are working, and until we finish the process, we cannot tell you when it will start and when it will finish. The most important thing is we will try to match the times of starting and finishing with the American times,” he said.

Natalio Sabal, a former Douglas mayoral candidate, told the Herald/Review “it blew my mind” when he heard Gomez state on the radio that he wants to develop the port of entry at Kings Highway.

He started a recall petition against Gomez on Aug. 3, citing several reasons, including “Failing to recognize that Agua Prieta and northern Mexico are economic lifeblood of community.”

Gomez said the reaction to his statements in the Dispatch and on KDAP was “unfortunate.”

“My goal with those comments was merely to set in motion a renewed spirit of cooperation between the two nations in an effort to join our parallel efforts and bring this important project to fruition,” he said.

The overall port of entry expansion project on federal land will cost about $40 million to $60 million, he explained. The cost of Chino Road improvements from Fifth Street to International Avenue along the border will be about $2 million. The city currently has allocated $800,000 and still needs $1.2 million.

He maintains that during the newspaper and radio interviews, he simply stated that the city needs to get funding from state or federal officials to finish Chino Road and it needs a commitment from Mexico for the port expansion.

“I never talked about any other site. We have been concentrating on this port of entry being right down behind Walmart.,” he said

“It was not my opinion when I said Mexico had not made a commitment,” he added. “All I did was relate that two GSA (General Services Administration) members said we need a commitment from Mexico or the timelines will be delayed.”

Gomez, who left his seat as a councilman to run for mayor in late 2007 and was elected in March 2008, said since early in his term as mayor, he has fully supported and has worked diligently to bring the port expansion project to the current site. “I have never voted against the port at the present location,” he added.

According to city records, then-Councilman Gomez cast the lone dissenting vote on Aug. 8, 2007, on a “discussion/decision to demonstrate agreement and support the Douglas port of entry feasibility study — 95 percent submittal prepared by the U.S. General Services Administration.” But, Gomez said, any large port expansion job goes through many planning stages, and the 95 percent feasibility study “contained wrinkles.”

“These wrinkles have since been straightened out and the current Douglas administration is in full support of the 100 percent feasibility study and proposed port project expansion,” he added.

Comments

    anonomous wrote on Sep 5, 2009 11:40 PM:

    " i think that we should just get a new mayjor i dont think things will work out having dr gomez as mayor and i also think there will be alot of complains about the new law of only allowing families to have 2 dogs at most and try to encourage enployers to hire people from the us rather than mexico they dont give anyone from here a chance on a job or schooling the schools are filled with them and so are stors like walmart and fast food resturants it wouldnt be a problem if you can acctually understand what they are saying "

    Yep wrote on Sep 1, 2009 10:50 PM:

    " Dear Mr. Mayor….don’t apologize, it is a sign of weakness and stick to your guns! No matter what you say or do, you can never keep the Mexican Government Happy. We can’t chat about anything because it’s offends them…..maybe they need Ray Borane back to keep them happy. "

    Harry wrote on Sep 1, 2009 11:09 AM:

    " I am amazed at the ignorance the mayor and council have demonstrate during Council meetings. Non of these folks seem to understand the economic side of our community or otherwise. Mayor Gomez needs to understood his role as Mayor of our town and that good communication skills is a need to learn and practice at all times especially during council meetings.
    Mayor Gomez needs to encourage the council to involve themselves in the decision making and not have a certain councilman bad mouth or demean another council member or by all means anyone else attending a council meeting. It is my belief most of the councilmen are reserved in participating different views or dispute any concern. They are either shy, ignorante, or afraid to speak up. These councilmen that are speechless--step down if you can't handle outspoken individuals. You don't belong in City Hall representing me. I am sure we have other interested individuals ready to take your positions. Come on guys and gal you are educated individuals--do your job! "

    Alex G Cruz Silva for mayor wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:41 PM:

    " IT'S TIME FOR NEW BLOOD and out with the old. The young leave Douglas b/c no one listens. Cruz Silva is a young buinessman who stayed in Douglas. knows how to make a buck. The GRANDPAS are the ones to blame for electing the mayor. They are the majority of the voters of douglas. It's not fair to go to infinia and get all their clients to vote for you. "

    Dan wrote on Aug 29, 2009 9:56 PM:

    " I gotta give the nod to the mayor in this. The last time the port was expanded it was delayed because of the Mexicans. "

    WTF wrote on Aug 29, 2009 7:59 PM:

    " I have an idea. We can flatten the whole town and have dogs breed and replace the people of the town. It would make a great news article. It might make a good town " Dogtown". It has a great ring to it! "

    Kinda Agree wrote on Aug 28, 2009 6:00 PM:

    " I agree with the opportunities, but understand our gov't is gov't - ultra risk adverse, worried about re-election when they should worry about "the people." The commercial world is accountable, cost conscious, efficient. Gov't - not so much….like frozen molasses. Worse in D. It’s too bad. "

    Sad State wrote on Aug 26, 2009 11:15 PM:

    " There are so many economic opportunities our town could capitalize on, but our leadership council seems to have limited economic understanding. This is an amazing opportunity for us business owners - growth, jobs, higher wages equals more tax revenues. It means a nicer city for all. Yet we sit. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750