McNeal defendant acquitted

By Jonathon Shacat
WICK NEWS SERVICE
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:45 PM MST


BISBEE — A jury acquitted Darryl Chenowth of murdering two men near his home in McNeal at the conclusion of a trial Wednesday in Cochise County Superior Court.


Chenowth, 52, was charged with first-degree murder of Thomas Rand, 44, and Leonardo Rivera, 20, on Jan. 11. Jurors were also allowed to consider lesser included offenses of second-degree murder and manslaughter.

The jury of seven men and five women deliberated for only a few hours on Wednesday before reaching the verdicts of not guilty on each count.

The defendant told law enforcement officials that Rivera’s pit bull terrier was causing problems for his cattle and horses. He said he warned Rivera that he would shoot the dog if it kept doing so.

On the night of Jan. 11, Chenowth said, he fatally shot the dog when it tried to bite him. He said Rivera threatened that he would to burn down his house with him inside.

Rand and Rivera confronted him. He said he shot them with a pistol in self-defense when Rand hit him in the leg with a stick and when he thought Rivera was going to strike him.

During closing arguments on Wednesday, James Glanville, deputy county attorney, said Chenowth was not justified in shooting them. He pointed out both victims died from wounds to their back.

He said Rand was shot in the abdomen and in the back of the neck, and Rivera was shot in the arm and in the back.

But, defense attorney Clarence Jenkins said Rivera was not shot “square in the back.” He argued his client was afraid of what Rand and Rivera would do to him. He pointed out Rand was drunk at the time.

Jurors started deliberating around noon Wednesday. After lunch, they requested another opportunity to watch a video of Chenowth’s interview with law enforcement officials from Jan. 12 and to listen to recordings of his phone calls to Cochise County Sheriff’s Office dispatchers and 911 from Jan. 10 and 11.

Those items were played for them in court between about 3 p.m. and about 4 p.m. They returned to the jury room for about half an hour, and then announced they had made their decision.

After the trial, Ken Sugden, who was the jury’s foreman, explained to the Herald/Review that members of the panel reviewed the evidence and they felt this outcome was appropriate.

He said some main factors in this case were the significant amount of stress that Chenowth experienced during the incident, and the way a person under attack can react automatically without any real thought.

 

Comments

    to disgusted wrote on Nov 18, 2009 8:56 PM:

    " They went to his property, threatened to burn him down, and delivered the first blow with a stick. These were younger men that had been drinking. They did not deserve what they got but this man did not deserve prison time for acting out of fear for his life. "

    Disgusted wrote on Nov 16, 2009 5:11 AM:

    " It amazes me that someone can get away with murder when they have killed someone in cold blood. I'm not thinking that is you shoot someone in the back it is self defense. Give me a break. "

    Good for you. wrote on Nov 12, 2009 12:29 PM:

    " I am glad at the outcome of this case. It should send a message, to criminals, that we are still in the USA and that we as citizens still have the right to deffend ourselves. Too many injustices have been done, when people that are defending themselves, wind up in jail. Once again I commend the jury for it's decission. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   



Classifieds

View All Ads
Place an Ad

Jobs

View All Jobs


Homes

View All Homes


Autos

View All Autos

Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750