State wants to raid funds

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:28 AM MDT


PHOENIX  Arizona voters need to give lawmakers permission to raid some special funds to get the state out of its immediate financial hole, the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee said Thursday.


And they need to do it soon.

The proposal by Rep. John Kavanagh, RFountain Hills, came as a panel of economists concluded that the gap between revenues and expenses for the current fiscal year is now just shy of $2 billion. Just days ago, Gov. Jan Brewer pegged the shortfall at $1.5 billion.

Kavanagh said some of that can be made up if Brewer finally agrees to sign legislation with close to $500 million in budget cuts that had been agreed to previously. But those cuts never occurred, lost in the middle of gubernatorial vetoes over other things in the same legislation.

And Kavanagh said he’s willing to put a measure on the same ballot asking voters to approve some sort of temporary sales tax hike. But he said there is no way that levy could raise enough by the end of the fiscal year on June 30.

A onecent surcharge on the state’s 5.6 percent sales tax generates about $80 million a month. Even if the election were in February  possibly the earliest date at this point  tax collections could not begin until March 1, meaning only about $320 million in new cash to plug that $2 billion hole.

What can raise a lot of cash, quickly, is raiding the special funds that are now offlimits to lawmakers.

Kavanagh singled out in particular funds that are being collected from an 80centapack tax on cigarettes approved by voters in 2006. That cash is earmarked for programs to improve early childhood development.

He said there is about $350 million in that fund.

“It’s crazy to be banking hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in dedicated tax money for special areas that we could use to help get us out of this mess,’’ Kavanagh said. “I don’t see how you get out of a $2 billion hole without using every resource that you can.’’

Taking those funds, however, would require voters to amend a 1998 constitutional measure which prohibits legislators from altering what voters have approved. And that election  assuming voters go along  would have to be completed before June 30, giving lawmakers the time to take the cash and use it to balance the books for the current fiscal year.

Kavanagh acknowledged it might be difficult to convince voters to let lawmakers raid that fund and others dedicated to specific programs like smoking cessation programs and buying land for conservation. But he said they need to realize that the alternative is far worse.

“If we don’t get that money, we’ll be shutting down all the state parks because there just is no money left to run this government,’’ he said. “You just can’t have bank accounts overflowing with cash that some of these groups aren’t even spending.’’

Kavanagh said there are better uses for those dollars than programs designed to help get small children off to a better education start.

“I’d rather be spending that money for preschool children health care and other issues that they need,’’ he said.

Liz Barker Alvarez, spokeswoman for the First Things First program, said lawmakers should keep their hands off the cash.

“The voters gave us our charge, and we are holding firm to the responsibility they gave us,’’ she said in a written response to questions. “The legislature needs to do the same.’’

She said it is the state’s obligation to fund “safety net’’ services.

“If there is a question about why sick children in Arizona don’t have access to the health care they need — or any other safety net services — then that’s a question for the Legislature, since it is their responsibility to fund those basic services,’’ she said. Anyway, she continued, all the funds her organization has received already are committed to programs and services that have been identified by individual communities as what they want for children and families.

Gubernatorial press aide Paul Senseman noted that Brewer endorsed the idea in March of giving lawmakers more flexibility in spending money that voters had earmarked for other purposes. But Senseman said the governor’s position on a special election depends on seeing more specifics from Kavanagh.

“We’ll look forward to hearing more details,’’ he said.

The underlying problem is that tax collections this year are expected to total only $6.4 billion. But the state is spending more than $10 billion.

Some of that is being made up with federal stimulus dollars, accounting maneuvers and the sale of $735 million of state buildings. But even with all that, Richard Stavneak, staff director of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, said the books are still nearly $2 billion out of balance.

Stavneak said there are indications that the economy will be slightly better next budget year.

He cautioned, though, that doesn’t mean the economy will be back on its feet. In fact, the revenues for next year are estimated at just $7.2 billion, and $7.7 billion the year after that  the amount of money Arizona collected in the 2005 fiscal year.

And there is no estimate as to when revenues will return to what they were in 2007  before the recession  when Arizona collected more than $9.6 billion in taxes.

 

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750