Sarah Palin’s evangelical-speak

By Terry Mattingly
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:09 AM MST


According to a top strategist in the presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain, Sarah Palin believed that the decision to pick her as the Arizona Republican’s running mate was actually made by Almighty God.


Translated into the logic of an Associated Press report, this political theology sounded like this.

“In an interview with the CBS news magazine ‘60 Minutes,’ Steve Schmidt described Palin as ‘very calm — nonplussed’ after McCain met with her at his Arizona ranch just before putting her on the Republican ticket. ... Schmidt said he asked Palin about her serenity in the face of becoming ‘one of the most famous people in the world.’ He quoted her as saying, ‘It’s God’s plan.’ “

The Washington Post headline proclaimed, “McCain aide: Palin believed candidacy ‘God’s plan.’”

After this latest Palin firestorm, it’s time to ask: Why can’t journalists learn to understand how ordinary evangelicals talk?

To make matters worse, readers have no chance to understand this private, secondhand quotation because it has been stripped of all context. There is no way to know whether this snippet is the entire Palin quote or merely what Schmidt has chosen to share as part of the ongoing fighting between factions inside McCain’s failed campaign.

The big question: Did Palin say her nomination was part of “God’s plan for her life” or did she, as implied, dare to claim that it was part of “God’s plan for America”? Most press reports have implied the latter, linking her faith-based confidence with speculation that she will run for president.

This has made her an easy target for critics — again.

“Palin isn’t a minister or priest. She isn’t a bishop. She is a celebrity,” noted Andrew Sullivan, on his Atlantic Monthly Web site.

“When she says ‘it’s God’s will,’ she is saying, it seems to me, either that her destiny is foretold as a modern-day Esther ... or that it doesn’t matter what decisions she makes in office because God is in charge. So she is either filled with delusions of grandeur and prone to say things that believing Christians keep private out of humility; or she thinks she’s some kind of Messiah figure.”

However, anyone with a working knowledge of evangelical lingo will understand that what Palin probably said was that this stunning door onto the national stage was, win or lose, part of “God’s plan” for her life.

This is the approach that she consistently uses in her memoir, “Going Rogue,” when discussing the twists and turns in her life — from an unexpected chance to climb the political ladder in Alaska to the challenge of an unexpected pregnancy, leading to the birth of a child with special needs.

In other words, Palin believes in a God who is mysteriously working through the choices and events — painful and joyful — that have shaped her life. This is a perfectly ordinary belief among millions of evangelical Protestants and, truth be told, many other believers, as well.

It may help to recall that, during the 2008 campaign, Charles Gibson of ABC News struggled to understand another piece of evangelical-speak drawn from Palin’s remarks about the Iraq War.

The governor told a church audience: “Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending (soldiers) out on a task that is from God. That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”

However, in his interview with Palin, Gibson said: “You said recently, in your old church, ‘Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.’ Are we fighting a holy war?”

Palin responded: “You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.”

Gibson fired back: “Exact words.”

Not exactly. Palin was reminding the worshipers to pray that God had a plan in Iraq and that decisions made by America’s leaders would be consistent with that plan. She was not, as Gibson said, stating that this was a certainty.

Bottom line: It may be time to circulate a basic “How Evangelicals Talk” phrase book that can be used in elite newsrooms, much like the one that journalists needed when then-Gov. Jimmy “born again” Carter first emerged on the national scene.

Terry Mattingly directs the Washington Journalism Center at the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities. Contact him at tmattingly(at)cccu.org or www.tmatt.net.

 

Comments

    Jakob wrote on Jan 20, 2010 1:15 PM:

    " The author is right. It is necessary to understand what is said in its own in its own context rather than transposing the matter into a foreign context. "

    DD wrote on Jan 20, 2010 12:46 PM:

    " It seems McLame didn't learn much by his first go round with this religious nut so he wants her to stump for him. Here's an idea.....SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE! "

    Harold wrote on Jan 20, 2010 12:30 PM:

    " The Douglas Dispatch playing the religious card? How quaint. "

    T Mack wrote on Jan 20, 2010 12:06 PM:

    " God's plan. Reaaallly. And the Haiti earthquakes were naturally "the Devil's plan". Seems to me that reality is merely in the eye of the interpreter. How do we truly know that Ms. Palin's destiny is actually not part of "the Devil's" plan and Haitian distress and suffering isn't part of "God's" greater plan to promote international cooperation and goodwill in times of strife? The truth is we mortals will never know and that demagogues who claim that THEY do, are to be mistrusted and better yet, ignored. "

    Michael wrote on Jan 20, 2010 11:49 AM:

    " I simply cannot wait to see and hear all of the nonsense that will come form her new TV show. The late night comedians will have a field day. "

    Lars wrote on Jan 20, 2010 11:43 AM:

    " Just because evangelicals talk a certain way, doesn't excuse them for what they say or think. Bottom line is, if Palin was in office, she could be making decisions to send people war, based on what she thinks God wants her to do. "

    jenny wrote on Jan 20, 2010 11:37 AM:

    " Well, ultimately EVERYTHING is part of God's plan, since God is everywhere and in all things. It was God's plan that McCain/Palin lose the election, it was God's Plan that Haiti get an earthquake, and that the Yankees win the world series. We shouldn't think too much about what God's plan is, just what our own plans are, since even prayer won't actually influence God's plan (even the most devout Christian can't pray for and receive winning lottery numbers or that their deceased loved ones rise from the dead.) "

    justiceserved wrote on Jan 20, 2010 11:32 AM:

    " You can parse this any way that you want but as far as I'm concerned my ancestors came here in the 1600's to avoid the religiousity that infiltrated the governments of Europe. Her lack of intellect & quitting, wrongdoing as Gov. aside, we do have a separation of church and state that the evangelicals would like to bridge and I for one will fight to keep this from happening. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750