Napolitano cites actions since death of Robert Krentz

BY SHAR PORIER
Wick News Service
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, April 21, 2010 5:39 PM MDT


BISBEE — After the death of Cochise County rancher Robert Krentz, Arizona and federal lawmakers voiced their outrage, but has there been a real effort to stop the crime and violence spilling over the border with Mexico?


According to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Arizona’s former governor, there are 100 additional Border Patrol agents and other law enforcement agencies in the San Bernardino Valley near where Krentz was shot. She also deployed Customs and Border Protection helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles.

It’s like closing the barn door after the horse has escaped.

“The people I represent do not believe that their federal government has heard their pleas for help,” Giffords wrote in a second request for help on the border. “While much has been done over the past months to increase border security, it is clear that our border is not yet secure and that drug cartel violence is threatening the lives of our citizens.”

Giffords, whose 8th Congressional District includes 114 miles of international border, called for the National Guard’s deployment on March 30, three days after Robert Krentz was slain on his Cochise County ranch. “On behalf of the people I represent and the thousands of other Americans who live in the most troubled sections of our southern border, I ask for your help in meeting the first responsibility of government: to provide for the safety and protection of its citizens.”

State Rep. Pat Fleming is convinced that there is a total failure to deal with crime and violence along the border in Arizona. “Our immigration system is broken and those in Washington, D.C., have been unable or unwilling to solve it. This is an issue that also requires leadership and action at the federal level or it will simply get worse, especially in Southern Arizona. Border security and immigration need to be acted on by Congress, as well, so that states and cities are not forced to act and bear the entire expense of enforcing our immigration laws. We need tough immigration reform that cracks down on human smugglers, the illegal sale of weapons to drug cartels and other violent criminals, and we need to give law enforcement the tools they need to secure our borders. I support making sure law enforcement has the tools they need to go after violent criminals.”

She agrees with the policy of being proactive on illegal immigration issues, but added that she wants immigrants here legally to be treated fairly and with respect.

Gov. Jan Brewer requested that Napolitano deploy National Guard troops to the border. She received no response. She’s decided to take action to protect the state from border violence and has assembled a task force to help deal with the growing violence that plagues border communities and the state, said her spokesman, Paul Senseman.

Brewer is working on a financially sustainable plan with her Security Cabinet officials that includes the Guard. Details are not available.

Brewer could deploy the Guard as a state active-duty mission, but it would cost Arizona taxpayers $28 million for 250 personnel and support staff. If Napolitano sent the Guard to the border, Washington, D.C., would pick up the tab.

U.S. Sen. John McCain also reviewed the Arizona Cattle Growers Association proposal and praised it. He said, “The plan includes a number of excellent proposals that I have advocated for and believe should be implemented — including putting additional Border Patrol agents on the border and deploying National Guard troops.”

McCain continued: “Adding Border Patrol is economically feasible and it should be done. The money to pay for these new agents can be reprogrammed from the failed Secure Border Initiative net virtual fence program.”

The virtual fence was touted as a critical component of the illegal immigration strategy of the Department of Homeland Security when run by Michael Chertoff back in 2006. The technology contract was awarded to Boeing that year. The goal was to field the most effective mix of current and next-generation technology, infrastructure, staffing and response platforms, according to the Department of Homeland Security Web site. The virtual fence was supposed to integrate multiple state-of-the-art systems and traditional security infrastructure into a single comprehensive border security suite.

Arizona’s Senate did pass a bill Tuesday that would provide new policies to give law enforcement agencies more leverage in apprehension of people in the country illegally. While it has yet to be signed into law by Brewer, it’s already drawing fire from civil rights activists who claim it perpetuates racial profiling.

As far as anyone knows, there are no added Guard boots on the ground in Arizona despite pleas from state and federal officials. But Giffords is not giving up. “Then and now, I believe that the deployment of the National Guard represents an essential first step in reassuring Arizona’s border communities of our commitment to their safety â€- We can and must bring this situation under control, and the responsibility rests with the federal government to get the job done.”

Shuttles busted

Federal officials arrested the owners and employees of five shuttle operations Thursday they charge were knowingly ferrying illegal immigrants from Tucson to Phoenix. John Morton, an assistant secretary of Homeland Security for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, described Thursday’s busts as a major shift in how ICE and other federal agencies will deal with illegal immigration. “We are not seeking to prosecute a given smuggler, a given shuttle company, a given driver,” he said.

Comments

    sarum wrote on May 11, 2010 2:50 AM:

    " This is an economic issue. The people making it a racial issue are the illegals themselves and their professional coaches behind the scenes and not so behind the scenes like Al "Blinded By the Light" Sharpton. (for his hatred and persecution of light skins.) I do agree that a human being should have a right to a sustainable wage job. However, citizens first! Also, citizens pay taxes, some of which are used to create a social safety net should any of us come on hard times. All too often the citizen is denied in their time of need but the illegal gets the help. This means that the citizen has been deprived of the benefit of their own wages. The only class of worker that is deprived the benefit of their wages that I know of is a slave. So we citizens of the U.S. have lost our right to self-determination when, for example, we are denied medical care through AHCCCS/Medicaid during our time of need. If we had known that we would be denied we could have saved our taxes all those years and provided another way. We are now slaves to the illegals who reap our benefits when we are denied. Part of a good solution is to identify illegals when they go to use hospital services. If they need to be stabilized first, do so, then transport them back to Mexico and give President "Do the Math" Calderone the bill. We know Napolitano. We know the federal government. We have to do it ourselves. It is said that Mexico's own law gives a 10 year prison sentence to illegals caught a 2nd time. Perhaps we should mirror their own law. Then who can complain? "

    To Joseph Perrin wrote on Apr 29, 2010 8:24 PM:

    " If you don't like illegals, maybe you can go back where you came from. Last I recall, this land belonged to the Indians. Now you know alittle how the Indians felt when 'white' people came and settled here!! What makes this your land! Reseach your histroy before you open your mouth! "

    Prudence wrote on Apr 24, 2010 5:03 AM:

    " The lack of enforcement of immigration laws has been scandalous and is ruining the lives and livelihoods of American citizens. The federal government hasn't done it's duty and should be sued for negligence, pay to rectify the situation, and be required to enforce it's own laws. The immigration authorities need to be investigated and lose their positions. It's outrageous! "

    Terri wrote on Apr 23, 2010 1:42 AM:

    " People don't normally climb a mountain when they can simply walk across the field. Build the mountain. Build the fence.

    I am very disappointed that not a single representative asked for fence money.

    A fence is either cost neutral or a cost saving. If the fence stops drugs from getting into America, then that is that many less drug addicts and dealers that no longer need to be jailed. Or illegal aliens who need to be sent home. Or hospital bills to be paid.

    Compare the cost of building the fence vs the cost of paying for jailing people in prisons and adding all these troups.

    The fence will pay for itself a hundred times over. "

    sean wrote on Apr 22, 2010 10:57 AM:

    " Dont't talk racial profiling and all that nonsense. Follow the law and U.S.will welcome anyone. Do not take advantage of our system just because we are nation of goodness. "

    Joseph Perrin wrote on Apr 22, 2010 12:34 AM:

    " I have been in Arizona every winter and have seen how violent it is.The illegals aren,t just comming here to work.And they are very quick to claim that they are being profiled.But everytime the police stop anyone they ask for a driver license.Why are they giving illegals the special privilage of not having to do the same?.The crimes against American,s has to stop.And when they say WHITE people isn,t that racism?.Get real the gloves have to come off.Thank you. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750