Giffords helps push through House border bill


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, August 4, 2010 4:37 PM MDT


WASHINGTON “ The U.S. House passed an appropriation for border security culminating in House passage of $701 million in emergency funds, said U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.


“The first responsibility of government is to protect its citizens from harm. The Senate failed in meeting this responsibility when it voted against border security funding last week”,” Giffords said today. “It now is the duty of the Senate to quickly approve this funding before it goes on recess. The people of Southern Arizona must not have their concerns on safety and security shunted aside any longer.”

The House approved the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Border Security Act. The bill now goes to the Senate for its consideration.

“I promised members of the Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association, when I spoke to them last week, that I would fight for this funding,” Giffords added. “It is important to them and it is important to me.”

Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House majority leader, praised Giffords for her work on the bill.

“Congresswoman Giffords has been working tirelessly for the border security funding that the constituents in her district demand and deserve,” said Hoyer. “She refused to take ‘no’ for an answer when the Senate approved a supplemental appropriations bill last week that did not include money for border security. Her tenacity paid off.”

The bill includes funding for:

· 1,200 additional Border Patrol agents;

· 500 more Customs and Border Protection officers at ports;

· Improved tactical communications along the Southwestern border;

· Three permanent Border Patrol forward operating bases;

· $50 million for Operation Stonegarden grants to support local law enforcement activities on the border;

· Two additional unmanned aircraft systems;

· $30 million for Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities, and

· $201 million for the Department of Justice to hire more agents for the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI and to hire additional prosecutors.

Giffords sponsored the legislation in response to last week’s Senate action to strip the $701 million in border security funding from an appropriations bill funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The border security funding had been included when the House approved the appropriations bill earlier this month in a 239-to-182 vote. The emergency funding for border security was added to the bill after Giffords secured the support of 50 of her colleagues to request that House appropriations leaders approve the money.

After the Senate rejection, Giffords worked with Rep. David Price of North Carolina, chairman of the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee, to introduce emergency appropriation legislation solely for border security.

In a speech earlier today on the floor of the House, Giffords thanked Price for “standing up against the narco-terrorists and showing Americans that this Congress is serious about border security.”

Price previously participated in one of a series of regularly scheduled border security conference calls that Giffords holds with Southern Arizona ranchers to hear their concerns and update them on congressional action to improve border security.

Giffords also told her colleagues, “Residents in my district are fed-up. They are tired of the break-ins, thefts, threats of violence and trash caused by the smuggling of drugs and people across their land every day.”

Giffords added, “We have entered a new phase of the border security problem and it is causing great fear among residents along the U.S.-Mexico border. - Border security is national security. A safe border helps make our whole nation more secure.”

After the House today approved the emergency border security funding, Giffords noted that several senators, in voting last week to strip the funds, said they did so because it was attached to an emergency appropriations bill that provided $32.8 billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“Those senators said unrelated domestic programs should not be attached to funding for these two critical military operations,” Giffords said. “I disagreed with that reasoning. To me national security means border security. Now, with passage of this bill, senators will have a clear choice. Do they support border security or do they not?”

Comments

    Listen wrote on Aug 20, 2010 6:38 AM:

    " I think Giffords is the only one who knows what she is talking about. She deserves to be re-elected. "

    jenny nakiso wrote on Aug 15, 2010 2:37 AM:

    " thank you for the loan "

    christopher masters wrote on Aug 14, 2010 3:42 PM:

    " well i will very much thank you if i can get some money all i am trying to do is take care of my children and get off the streets thank you and ihope this works for me. "

    tomas wrote on Aug 12, 2010 7:02 PM:

    " Giffords is a lackey for the likes of Pelosi and the other money mongers in Washington. Just look at where all her money comes from. She has made such bad votes(same as Pelosi) she is trying to distract us with this expensive but substantially meaningless legislation! "

    t wrote on Aug 10, 2010 12:08 PM:

    " Michael Baldwin,
    Can you give us a reason why you don't like Giffords? She seems to be the only one working to help Southern Arizona. Perhaps you know something the rest of us don't. Please share. "

    Common Sense wrote on Aug 6, 2010 7:44 AM:

    " Giffords has more smarts and common sense than Kyl, McCain, Brewer and Arpaio put together. "

    Michael Baldwin wrote on Aug 4, 2010 10:36 PM:

    " You won't post it because you're part of the reason she and all of the others are so stupid. "

    Michael Baldwin wrote on Aug 4, 2010 10:34 PM:

    " Congresswoman Giffords,
    You are a freaking IDIOT! That's all the time i'll spend on your dumb beleifs. "

    Idealist wrote on Aug 4, 2010 8:14 PM:

    " Why don't we train our american soldiers on the boarder? Instead of field training in secure places in the US, why not train in an only mildly violent area?

    There is plenty of room to hike. They would be serving a purpose WHILE they learn their field training.

    If we secure our borders, THEN hand out american citizenship applications to those already in america. Have them go through the same process everyone else does, Then collect taxes from them. Isn't that the big issue here? Tax free workers? I do not think it is a race issue, it is a fund issue for the majority of Americans (I hope and assume...). "

    Next issue wrote on Aug 4, 2010 6:09 PM:

    " Giffords can pass whatever she wants, Douglas City Council will shoot it down and vote against any Border security for Douglas. Where citizens are invlovled this does not matter, politics are more important to the Douglas Administration...Next issue "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750