Local, federal leaders speak out on ruling

By Natalie Lakosil
Douglas Dispatch
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, August 4, 2010 4:37 PM MDT


The Douglas Dispatch reached out to citizens around Douglas to ask their feelings on the recent changes on State Bill 1070.


Douglas Mayor Dr. Michael Gomez stated, “I agree with Judge Bolton and think she did a good job. About two months ago the City Council and I announced we did not support the state bill 1070. I think the judge made a good ruling till everything in the courts is settled. The issue is still in the courts and nobody knows the outcome. We will just have to do what the judge decides and enforce what we are required. I support Police Chief Melis and the city will do what we have to do.”

Douglas Police Chief Melis: “As far as I am concerned there is no difference between yesterday and today (referring to the decision made on Wednesday July 28), I will continue to do my job. I do not make the laws I just carry them out.”

Del Cabarga: “I am pleased and hope it will begin a healing process in our communities.” When asked what he thinks is the solution to resolve the immigration issues that the federal government should implement, he said, “I think that in order to come to a solution the government needs to first create a mechanism that will bring forth people to decide collectively in the democratic spirit. A mechanism of decision-making both inclusive and cooperative, which avoids adversarial posturing and partisanship.”

City Council Member Mitch Lindemann declined to comment for lack of information. Local rancher William McDonald declined to comment and Ginny Jordan was unable to be reached.

U.S. Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl today made the following statement: “We are deeply disappointed in the court’s ruling today and disagree with the court’s opinion that the Arizona’s law will unduly ‘burden’ the enforcement of federal immigration law. “Instead of wasting tax payer resources filing a lawsuit against Arizona and complaining that the law would be burdensome, the Obama Administration should have focused its efforts on working with Congress to provide the necessary resources to support the state in its efforts to act where the Federal government has failed to take responsibility.” “After this decision, it’s even more important to implement our Ten Point Border Security plan to protect Arizonans and our country.”

Mexican Consulate: The Ministry of Foreign Relations, on behalf of the Government of Mexico, fully acknowledges the US District Court of Arizona’s decision to provisionally suspend the entry into force of some sections of SB 1070 in Arizona. It is a first step in the right direction.

The preliminary injunction will not allow the State police of Arizona to: a) determine upon detention and in the context of SB 1070, the immigration status based on reasonable suspicion; b) detain an individual without a warrant when there is suspicion of undocumented presence in the United States; c) request the person to bear documentation identifying him or her as an immigrant; and d) criminalize the application, solicitation or performance of a job by an unauthorized migrant.

The Government of Mexico has implemented and will continue strengthening actions to prevent violations of immigrants’ rights and to provide consular protection in those cases in which the rights of Mexican nationals are violated.

The Government of Mexico, through its five Consulates in Arizona has established and strengthened rapid response mechanisms aimed at guaranteeing that effective legal advice is provided in those specific cases in which the rights of Mexican nationals are being violated. In this context the Government of Mexico has strengthened and expanded its network of lawyers currently collaborating under the umbrella of the External Legal Assistance Program (PALE). It will also continue to increase its consular presence in Arizona’s detention centers and its permanent communication with federal authorities to gather information of incidents concerning Mexican nationals.

With the support of civil society organizations, we will detect and compile possible cases of human rights violations against Mexican nationals. We will inform Mexican communities on the implications of SB 1070 through community and educational fora. We will continue offering 24-hour personalized attention through the call-center set up in Arizona to provide information and guidance to affected parties (1-877-63CONSUL). We will intensify consular staff training on the scope of SB 1070, and as a preventive consular measure, additional information brochures and cards will be distributed to promote Mexican nationals’ awareness of their fundamental rights.

Mexico’s five consulates in Arizona will continue visiting Mexican communities through our mobile consulates, and working on Saturdays, in addition to their regular business hours, until further notice so as to guarantee proper consular attention.

The Government of Mexico hereby expresses its recognition of the determination shown by the Government of the United States and to the actions of those civil organizations that filed lawsuits against SB 1070.

Furthermore, the Government of Mexico is grateful to the Governments of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay and Peru, who joined the Amicus Curiae brief filed by Mexico.

In keeping with its firm commitment to protecting the rights of Mexicans abroad, regardless of their immigration status, the Government of Mexico will continue to closely follow the legal process derived from the decision of the District Court and of any higher courts, until SB 1070 is declared unconstitutional.

Comments

    Stay cool wrote on Aug 26, 2010 1:28 PM:

    " Mexico is not the problem. Never was. Globalization is the big problem. Used to be in order for there to be rich countries you had to have poor countries. Now the money is in the hands of multinational companies with CEOs who have no loyalty to any country. Every country would be poor and it would not hurt them. They just fly around looking for more oil or other rich deposits of resources anywhere they can buy influence. We could all be out begging in the streets in the next economic scam. "

    Francisco Segovia wrote on Aug 24, 2010 3:51 PM:

    " It is terribly disappointing when the consulate speaks of human rights violations here in the U.S. for Mexican Nationals when he and his government turn a blind eye to the human rights being withheld from his own people in his country. Human rights such as Life, Liberty, and the Persuit of Happiness. Shame on him for pointing his finger at this great nation when his own country fails to even provide for a decent living for their people. As for Mr. Cabarga's solution to the problem, I think he has complicated things beyond what they need to be. The simple solution is for the Mexican government to clean up the corruption found at every level of government and begin investing the country's wealth back into Mexico so as to provide for a decent standard of living for the Mexican people. When Mexico decides to stop blaming other Nnations for their woes and begins to take responsibility for their people, then the immigration problem will be resolved. "

    Once Again wrote on Aug 23, 2010 12:45 PM:

    " There have been racists trying to get rid of migrant groups throughout America's history. They have gone after the Chinese when the railroads were first built. They went after the Irish after the potato famine brought them here. They went after the Italians after World War I. Now the haters are going after Mexican people. "

    Too Easy wrote on Aug 6, 2010 2:00 PM:

    " McCain and Kyl want to deport everyone who looks like a Mexican. Why don't they go to Tombstone and deport all those Germans that like to watch the gunfighters and saloon girls? Why don't they go to Boston and deport all those Irish that are working without papers? Why don't they go to New York City and deport all those Russians who are working without papers? "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street (85607)
P.O. Drawer H
Douglas, AZ 85608
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750