County fights
endangered
species proposals

BY SHAR PORIER
WICK NEWS SERVICE
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:55 PM MST


BISBEE — How do you


balance the needs of an agricultural

community and economic

development with the

need to preserve habitat for

threatened and endangered

species as mandated by federal

law under the Endangered

Species Act?

This is a problem that the

county faces as a number of

species are being proposed

for up-listing under the Endangered

Species Act. From

2-inch minnows, which no

longer live in their historic

home territory in the San Pedro

River, to a rare jaguar recently

sighted in an undisclosed

location within

Cochise County, the county

Board of Supervisors has to

balance what’s good for the

residents with what’s good

for the preservation of declining

species. With each

species listed by the U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service,

critical habitat is established

which can impede agriculture,

ranching, development

and recreation in the county.

Recently, the supervisors

joined with Sierra Vista and

the Arizona-New Mexico

Counties Coalition to fight a

few of the proposed designations.

They agreed to share

the $4,880 cost of hiring

Darling Environmental &

Surveying, Ltd., to produce

an analysis of data gathered

by FWS on the spikedace

and loach minnow to provide

the basis for excluding

Cochise County sites.

Recently, FWS suggested

setting aside certain areas as

critical habitats for the fishes,

which were historically

abundant in the San Pedro

River on the Arizona side of

the border. Afew areas along

the river and its tributaries

could be protected. Both

fishes were listed as threatened

in 1986, but wildlife

groups are proposing the

fishes be upgraded to “endangered.”

About 796 miles of

streams and rivers are being

proposed for critical habitat

designation in Apache,

Cochise, Gila, Graham,

Greenlee, Navajo, Pima,

Pinal, and Yavapai counties,

and western New Mexico.

If FWS requires the San

Pedro River be designated as

critical habitat, it would include

the river plus 300 feet

on either side of the banks.

Much of the San Pedro is

already protected as a riparian

area and if the designation were approved, it may not

mean there will be additional

habitat set aside. The U.S.

Bureau of Land Management

states on the website:

“The San Pedro Riparian National

Conservation Area

contains nearly 57,000 acres

of public land in Cochise

County between the international

border and St. David.”

It includes 40 miles of the upper

San Pedro River that is

home to 84 species of mammals,

14 species of fish, 41

species of reptiles and amphibians,

and 100 species of

breeding birds. It also provides

habitat for 250 species

of migrant and wintering

birds.

The main concern is that

the San Pedro River is an intermittent

stream and during

the monsoon carries silt and

sediment that may not be

beneficial to the loach minnow

and spikedace, which

require gravel and rubble

bottoms and prefer a strong

flowing stream. So, there is a

question whether the San Pedro

will actually provide the

habitat necessary for the fishes’

survival.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street
Douglas, AZ 85607
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750
Subscribe Online
Place A Classified