County supervisors put hold on restoration project for century-old building

BY SHAR PORIER
Wick News Service
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:47 PM MDT


BISBEE — Though the county Board of Supervisors awarded a $3.849 million contract to Concord General Contracting for the restoration of the former Phelps Dodge building in Douglas on Tuesday, one supervisor wanted to slow things down to take a closer look at preserving the massive pillars and beautiful wooden and wrought iron staircase and railing in the more than 100-year-old building.


Shar Porier/Wick News Service Tuesday afternoon, April 5, County Supervisor Richard Searle, left, talked with County Administrator Mike Ortega, right, and Douglas City Manager Curtis Shook about saving the wooden and wrought iron staircase in the old Phelps Dodge building in Douglas. Though the architect is calling for a new staircase to meet code, the county wants to keep as much of the interior as intact as possible.

For several years, the county has been looking for a place to bring all the county offices in Douglas under one roof. When the city council members suggested the county partner with them to restore the old building, the supervisors took it and a few other locations under consideration. The new site had to be big enough to house the justice court, health department, a regional sheriff’s office, adult and juvenile probation and planning and zoning.

Last summer, an agreement was reached between Douglas and the county to partner in the revitalization of the former Phelps Dodge general store. Plans were drawn up with input from the city, county department heads and county administration.

Now, those plans have been altered.

“Part of the attraction of the project was its historical nature. The idea was to preserve it inside and out. I’m disappointed that it has been gutted,” said Supervisor Richard Searle. He was not happy when the architect, David Wald-Hopkins of BWS Architects, said the staircase could not be saved, nor the old ceiling tiles, nor the pillars. “It probably would have cost as much to build a new building.”

Wald-Hopkins explained the staircase did not meet building code, the railings were too short and the metal ceiling tiles had been painted with lead paint. Since the plans included attaching walls to the lead-paint celling, it would create a toxic hazard. So, he proposed to build a new staircase and install new metal ceiling tiles. “We could use some of the wood from the old staircase.”

Ortega said to Searle, “I share your disappointment. I think we need to have a conversation with staff. We need to take the time and analyze this. Look closely at the stairwell.”

Concord’s bid is good for 30 days, so the supervisors put a hold on construction proceeding until determinations on the building’s interior could be discussed further.

Supervisor Ann English stated that the building had to meet code and there was no other option. “I think they’ve done what they could. When you deal with old buildings you always have to expect the unexpected.”

With the budget problems the county faces, Supervisor Pat Call said, “I am concerned about spending the money in these tough times. But, this money was put aside years ago. It’s an investment in our employees and in Douglas. I’ve had problems with building rehabilitations and cost. In this case, we’ve been able to make it work. And once it’s finished, it won’t require much in upkeep.”

In other business at the community outreach meeting held in Douglas, the superintendents:

• Made two proclamations: one for Childhood Cancer Week from April 24 through April 30 and National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, April 10 through April 16.

• Heard a presentation from Victor Gonzalez of the Douglas Regional Economic Development Corporation, who also requested the county join the group and pay $10,000. There was no further discussion on the request.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street
Douglas, AZ 85607
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750
Subscribe Online
Place A Classified