The truth about beef


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 3:12 PM MDT


Dear Editor,


Lean Finely Textured Beef. You've heard about it in the news, referred to as "pink slime." What is it? What does this mean? Here are some references for you to know the facts.

Lean finely textured beef is just that. Beef. When steaks and roasts are cut, it creates the "trim" that becomes ground beef. The companies supplying lean finely textured beef use a process to remove a lot of the fat from the lean beef in the trim, which is then added to ground beef as a concentrated, lean source of protein. It's beef plain and simple. The nutritional profiles of lean finely textured beef and traditional ground beef are nearly identical. Lean finely textured beef is 90%-to-95% lean (5%-10% fat) and, just like all beef, is a good or excellent source of 10 essential nutrients including protein, iron, zinc and B vitamins.

Ground beef offers affordable nutrition for kids, which is critical given shrinking school budgets, rising food costs and the fact that for many kids, school lunch is their best chance at a getting a well-balanced meal during the day.

Ground beef that includes lean finely textured beef is safe according to independent scientists, safety advocates and the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). By law, E. coli and Salmonella cannot be in meat supplied for school lunch. In some cases, a small, safe amount of ammonia hydroxide gas or citric acid is used to produce the lean finely textured beef, which like other safety measures along the way, reduces the potential for bacterial contamination. FSIS has reviewed and approved this practice as safe, and safety advocates have applauded it as an effective way of ensuring safe beef for consumers.

If you would like more information, please visit www.beefisbeef.com.

Respectfully,

Sue Krentz

Past President Arizona State Cowbelles 1995-1996

The Cowbelles

 

Comments

    beefeater wrote on May 1, 2012 11:17 PM:

    " The fact that pink slime was previously only fit for DOG FOOD is enough information for me to decide I'm not going to willingly eat it.
    I understand people in the beef industry wanting to protect their interests, but that's just part of a huge national problem--protecting industry interests above society's interests is just unethical. It's also a big reason our government is broken. "

    Still not convinced wrote on Apr 17, 2012 1:12 PM:

    " Thank you for posting this information Mrs Krentz. But I'm still going to pass on the Pink Slim just not a fan, nor am I a fan of the process of adding ammonia to sterilize it.

    Even though the scientists say it's OK to consume the USFDA say the same thing about giving cattle growth harmones. Now they are not so sure if its bad for human health or not.

    In 1988 the European Union banned the import of US beef due to our use of steroids in our cattle.

    I also try to stay away from beef product ("parts") patties Hearts organs pieces etc. I perfer fresh ground Chuck for my burgers. And the majority of the beef I consume is farm/ranch raised and taken to the butcher directly.

    Expensive yes, but always quality meat.. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Douglas Dispatch is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in douglasdispatch.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Douglas Dispatch. The Douglas Dispatch does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Douglas Dispatch spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   









Contact Us

Email the Editor
530 11th Street
Douglas, AZ 85607
tel: 520.364.3424
fax: 520.364.6750
Subscribe Online
Place A Classified